Role of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes in the detoxication of aristolochic acid I; effects on DNA adduct, mutation, and tumor formation
© The Author(s) 2015
Received: 29 December 2014
Accepted: 8 March 2015
Published: 30 July 2015
Hepatic cytochrome P450s (CYPs) play an important role in the metabolism of plant carcinogen, aristolochic acid I (AAI). In the present study, we employed hepatic NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase null (HRN) gpt delta transgenic mice to investigate the role of hepatic CYPs in the metabolism of AAI. DNA adduct formation, gene mutation, and tumor induction in the liver and kidneys were analyzed. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed and tissue levels of AAI were determined.
Pretreatment with β-naphthoflavone in wild type gpt delta transgenic mice (BNF-WT mice) could increase the rate of clearance of AAI in blood and tissues, and decrease the formation of AAI-DNA adducts in kidney. In contrast, there was reduced clearance of AAI in HRN gpt delta mice, which showed increased concentration of AAI in tissues and increased levels of DNA adducts. The mutant frequencies of gpt gene, induced by AAI, in the kidneys of HRN gpt delta mice were significantly higher than that in WT mice. In the tumor induction assay, after treatment for 2 months with daily doses of 5 mg/kg AAI, mice were kept under observation for 7 months. During this period, papillomatous changes occurred in the forestomach of both WT-AAI mice and HRN gpt delta-AAI mice. Squamous cell carcinomas were found in the forestomach of 2 HRN gpt delta-AAI mice, which had also metastasized to other tissues. In addition, adenomas were found in 2 of 8 HRN gpt delta-AAI mice, in the absence of squamous cell carcinomas.
These results indicated that the main role of hepatic CYPs is to aid in the excretion of AAI, and to protect the target organs against AAI induced DNA adduct formation, mutagenesis, and tumorigenesis.
KeywordsAristolochic acid I (AAI) Hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) gpt delta mice DNA adduct Gene mutation assay Tumorigenesis
Aristolochic acid (AA), a naturally occurring nephrotoxin and carcinogen, derived from Aristolochia plant species, is associated with aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) [1, 2], Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) , and their urothelial malignancies . Herbal remedies containing species of the genus Aristolochia and the AA mixture were classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer .
Demethylation of AAI to 8-OH-aristolochic acid I (AAIa) is believed to be a detoxification reaction, where AAIa is much less toxic and easily excreted in urine compared with AAI [6–8]. In contrast, nitroreduction of AAI is believed to be the major metabolic activation pathway, which potentiates the carcinogenic effect. Reduction of a nitro group of AA will form reactive cyclic nitrenium ions, which can interact with the exocyclic amino groups of deoxyadenosine and deoxyguanosine, resulting in the preferential formation of purine adducts 7-(deoxyadenosin-N 6-yl) aristolactam I (dA-AAI) and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N 2-yl) aristolactam I (dG-AAI) . The predominant AA-DNA adduct dA-AAI is a mutagenic lesion resulting in A:T to T:A transversions in the p53 gene of urothelial tumors from AAN and BEN patients, and in codon 61 of H-Ras gene from AAI-treated rodents [10–12]. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily plays a pivotal role in both detoxification and activation of AAI. In vitro studies showed that AAI is reduced, instead of oxidized, at low oxygen concentrations, whereas under aerobic conditions AAI is oxidized to generate AAIa, suggesting the toxicity of AAI may depend on the balance between oxidation and reduction . Since in vitro studies are limited by the absence of factors, that are important in vivo, such as the route of administration, coupling to phase-II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, and tissue-specific expression of CYPs, in vivo studies could provide relevant information on the actual process of AAI metabolism. In our previous study, we used conditional hepatic NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase null mice (HRN mice), and demonstrated that hepatic CYPs detoxify AA through demethylation thus completing the detoxification cycle, and protecting kidneys from AA-induced mice kidney injury [14, 15]. Others studied the role of CYPs in AAI activation and the formation of AAI-DNA adducts in Cyp1a1(−/−), Cyp1a2(−/−) , Cyp1a1/1a2(−/−) mice , HRN mice , and humanized hCYP1A mice . Since carcinogenesis is a multistep process, there is no single toxicological end point that is associated with complete carcinogenic potency. Risk assessment of a chemical should involve multistep analysis of carcinogenesis, and thus, the role of CYPs in AAI-induced mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in vivo still needs to be confirmed.
We previously reported the generation of an HRN gpt delta mouse model, by crossing HRN mice with gpt delta transgenic mice , which was a useful tool for investigating the role of hepatic CYPs in the metabolism of genotoxic carcinogens. In the present study, we analyzed the formation of DNA adducts, mutant frequencies of gpt gene as well as mutation spectrum characteristics, tumor induction in AAI- treated HRN gpt delta mice, combined with pharmacokinetic analysis and tissue level detection of AAI. Among the P450 superfamily, CYP1A is known to be involved in activation/detoxification of a variety of procarcinogens, in the present study, we pretreated animal with a non-carcinogen CYP1A inducer β-naphthoflavone (BNF) to clarify the role of hepatic CYP1A in the bioactivation of AAI by the detection of DNA adducts level. We finally determined the effect of hepatic CYPs on carcinogenesis, induced by AAI. We demonstrated that hepatic CYPs play a major role in completing the detoxification cycle and protect the target organs from AAI-induced genotoxicity.
Materials and methods
AAI (96 %) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Aristolactam I (ALI) was obtained from Shanghai ChemPartner Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 2′-Deoxyadenosine (dA), 2′-deoxyguanosine (dG), DNase I, and phosphodiesterase I were obtained from Sangon Biotech Shanghai Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Alkaline phosphatase was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC. (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile were obtained from MSD Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Munchen, Germany). Other reagents were analytically pure.
Animal use and treatment
Generation and characterization of HRN gpt delta mice were reported previously. The Shanghai Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal experiments [Certificate No. SCXK (Shanghai) 2002–0010]. Animals were acclimatized in specific pathogen-free rooms with the temperature at 20 to 26 °C, humidity at 30 to 70 %, and a 12 h light/dark cycle for at least 1 week. Regular laboratory chow and filtered tap water were allowed, as per requirements.
AAI-DNA adduct analysis
Wild type (WT) mice were pretreated with a single intraperitoneal injection of BNF (BNF-WT) at 80 mg/kg in corn oil, once daily for 3 days, before injection of AAI. Male WT, BNF-WT, and HRN gpt mice were intragastically treated with AAI at a dose of 15 mg/kg for 2 days, then killed 24 h following the final treatment, and kidneys and livers were removed and stored at −40 °C, until further analysis for AAI-DNA adducts .
Male WT gpt and HRN gpt delta mice, at the age of 8 weeks, were intragastically treated with 15 mg/kg AAI, once a week, for 4 consecutive weeks. One week after the final treatment, the mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Kidneys and livers were removed and quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored in a deep freezer at −70 °C until further analysis.
Tumor induction assay
Thirty-nine female WT gpt delta mice and 35 female HRN gpt delta mice used in this study were divided into 4 groups: WT gpt control, WT gpt-AAI, HRN gpt control, and HRN gpt delta-AAI. AAI was dissolved in 1 % NaCO3. Mice were dosed orally with 5 mg/kg AAI for 2 months. Mice were then killed for histological examination after a 4- and 7-month recovery.
Determination of the levels of AAI and metabolites in blood, liver, and kidney
Blood samples (20 μl each) were collected by tail bleeding at 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 min and tissue samples were collected at 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after a single oral dose (15 mg/kg) of AAI (n = 4 per group) to male mice. Collected samples were further processed as described previously . Aliquots of the final supernatants were analyzed and quantified, for the levels of AAI and its reductive metabolites aristolactam I (ALI) by HPLC. The identity of AAI and associated metabolites were confirmed with previously described standards.
Quantitative analysis of AAI–DNA adducts in liver and kidney of mice
The isolation of total genomic DNA, from kidney and liver, was carried out by the phenol/chloroform method. DNA samples were digested and enriched by ethyl acetate. DNA adducts were detected by the liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-multi-stage-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS–MS) method, reported previously . Deoxyadenosine-AAI (dA-AAI) (external standard) and tolbutamide (internal standard) were used to quantify the concentration of AAI-DNA adducts, and deoxyadenosine was used to quantify the concentration of normal deoxynucleosides.
Mutation assay of gpt gene was performed using the method, reported previously . Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from kidneys and liver, and lambda EG10 DNA (48 kb) was rescued as phages by in vitro packaging. Packaged phages were incubated with Escherichia coli YG6020. Infected cells were mixed with molten soft agar and poured onto agar plates containing chloramphenicol and 6-Thioguanine (6-TG). To determine the total number of rescued plasmids, infected cells were also poured onto plates containing chloramphenicol without 6-TG. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C. Positively selected colonies were counted on day 3 and collected on day 4. The mutant frequencies were calculated by dividing the number of gpt mutants by the number of rescued phages. gpt gene of mutant colonies were sequenced. Duplicate mutations at the same site within an individual tissue of gpt gene were excluded to account for colonial expansion of sibling mutations. The data obtained from the study were expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Dunnett’s test, after one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, was used to evaluate the differences. Mutational spectra were compared using the computer program written by Cariello , for the Monte Carlo analysis developed by Adams and Skopek . The calculated p values, which were lower than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Tumor induction assay
Mice were killed by an overdose of carbon dioxide (CO2). After a recovery of 4 or 7 months, the mice were terminated, and kidney, liver, stomach, small and large intestine, urinary bladder, lungs, and spleen were excised and fixed in 10 % formalin for histological examination. Paraffin sections (3 μm) were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and examined microscopically.
Levels of AAI and associated metabolites in plasma and tissues
Formation of AAI-derived DNA adducts in liver and kidneys
Formation of AA-DNA adducts in the liver and kidney of gpt delta transgenic mice treated with AAI or AAII
AAI-derived DNA adducts
per 107 dN
per 107 dN
per 107 dN
15.92 ± 4.46
10.38 ± 4.86
26.29 ± 9.22
029.94 ± 11.46
24.02 ± 6.30
053.96 ± 16.52
58.09 ± 9.50
68.68 ± 6.93
126.77 ± 12.28*
101.59 ± 45.30
152.15 ± 26.52
253.75 ± 38.08*
Mutant frequencies of gpt induced by AAI in the liver and kidneys
Preneoplasia and neoplasia induced by AAI
Number of neoplsia in WT mice and HRN gpt delta mice treated with AAI for two months
4 months recovery
7 months recovery
Papilloma with signs of malignancy
Squamouse cell carcinoma
Mice with neoplasia
As several studies indicate, metabolism of AAI plays a very important role in the initiation and progress of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) and Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) [19, 26–29]. Understanding which enzymes are involved in AAI activation and/or detoxification is important in the assessment of the susceptibility to this carcinogen. AAI could be demethylated to form AAIa, excreted individually or conjugated with glucuronide, acetate, or sulfate esters, which is the metabolic detoxification pathway of AAI. Human and rodent enzymes, CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, are the principal enzymes involved in the detoxification pathway in vitro and in vivo. AAI could also be activated by nitroreduction metabolism and generate an intermediate a cyclic nitrenium ion, which can covalently bind the exocyclic amino groups of DNA bases, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1). CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 have been proven to be the main responsive enzymes, in vitro and in vivo [16–18]. Therefore, CYPs are involved in both detoxification and reductive activation of AAI. The present study has been designed to obtain an overall evaluation of the role of hepatic CYPs in the contrasting processes of detoxification or activation of AAI by measuring 3 toxic endpoints: DNA adduct formation, gene mutation, and tumor induction by using a novel HRN gpt delta mouse model.
In the present study, the levels of AAI, in blood, kidney, and liver, in HRN gpt delta-AAI mice were higher than those in BNF-WT-AAI mice and WT-AAI mice. The number of AAI-DNA adducts formed in the kidney and liver of HRN gpt delta-AAI mice were also higher than those in BNF-WT-AAI mice and WT-AAI mice. These results suggested that hepatic CYPs metabolize AAI, and reduce the exposure level and formation of AAI-DNA adducts in vivo, which were consistent with the results reported previously [21, 30]. We further determined the gpt mutant frequencies, mutation spectrum, and tumor induction to study the effects of hepatic CYPs on AAI-induced mutagenesis and tumorigenesis by using the HRN gpt delta-AAI mice. Our findings provide further substantial evidence that the main role of hepatic CYPs is to help AAI to be excreted, and to protect target organs against AAI-induced mutagenesis and tumorigenesis.
We previously reported HRN gpt delta mice could provide useful information on the metabolism of carcinogen . It is indisputable that a direct measure of induced gene mutations is better than other genetic end points such as DNA damage. The formation of DNA adducts is a critical determinant of mutagenicity, however, the final mutational events depend also on DNA repair which can eliminate DNA adducts. In the present study, our data showed the level of dG-AAI was higher than dA-AAI in the kidney of AAI treated HRN-gpt mice, but the dominant mutation pattern was at A:T- > T:A in the kidney of AAI treated HRN-gpt mice (Additional file 1: Table S1), suggested the DNA repair efficiency might be different between dA-AAI and dG-AAI, which need a further study. Moreover, metabolic activation usually generates various intermediates from different pathways, which may pose difficulties for detection of DNA adducts, although our in vivo gene mutation assay will overcome this limitation. Furthermore, HRN gpt delta mice could detect deletion mutations by Spi- assay. The Spi- assay results showed that HRN gpt delta mice had higher MFs than WT mice, but the magnitude of increase for Spi- assay was lower than that of 6-TG selection (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Mutation spectrum analysis showed the predominant deletion was 1 to 2 base pairs, which occurred in “C” or “G” bases in gam gene (Additional file 1: Table S3), which was different from 6-TG selection. The mechanism of mutagenesis thus, needs to be further investigated.
Carcinogenic profiles are different between rats and mice dosing with AA in varied recipes [25, 31–33]. The papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas in forestomach and urinary bladder, adenomas, mesenchymal tumours and oncocytoma in kidney, carcinomas in renal pelvis et al. could be found in rats [31–33], whereas papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas in forestomach, carcinomas in lung, adenomas in kidney et al. could be found in miceafter administration of different doses of AA or AAI in different dosing durations . The results indicated that the main carcinogenic profiles up to date for the mice are the papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas occurred in forestomach, the carcinomas in lung and the adenomas in kidney.
It was reported that the short-term high dose AA or AAI exposure could induce cancers and tumors in both rats and mice though the profile were somehow different. Mengs  found papillomatous changes occurred in the forestomach, squamous cell carcinomas were observed in all the animals, adenomas of the kidneys, carcinomas of the lungs, and haemangiomas of the uteri after treatment for 3 weeks with AA in daily doses of 5.0 mg/kg in NMRI mice which were kept under observation for approximately 1 year. Another study reported by Cui et al.  showed female Sprague–Dawley rats dosed with AAI at 50 mg/kg for consecutive three days could induce tumors in kidney. Based on this speculation, the dose at 5 mg/kg AAI was selected for our study and the dosing duration was also prolonged to 2 months (nearly 8 weeks) which was longer than Mengs’ study and was supposed to induce tumors or cancers earlier. The total durations for determining the tumorigenesis or carcinogenesis were 6 months and 9 months after the first administration which equivalent to the durations of 26 weeks and 37 weeks reported by Mengs . Due to the high tumor incidence found in the Mengs’ study, the minimum group size should be ≥ 4. We aimed to obtain the comparable data between AAI-gpt and AAI-HRN-gpt to investigate if there were differences between them. The papilloma and squamous cell carcinomas were present in the forestomach in both, AAI-gpt and AAI-HRN-gpt mice. We found adenomas in the duodenum in 2 other AAI-HRN-gpt mice in the absence of squamous cell carcinomas. One squamous cell carcinoma was present in the liver of one HRN mouse, and had invaded the esophagus. The results indicated that the AAI-HRN-gpt mice showed a higher sensitivity for AAI tumorigenesis or the when CYPs activity is reduced in liver more tumors and of higher severity are induced in the extra-hepatic target tissues.
By using HRN gpt delta mice, we demonstrated that although hepatic CYPs are involved in AAI-induced mutagenicity, the main role of CYPs is to help AAI to be excreted, and to protect target organs against AAI-induced DNA adduct formation, mutagenesis, and tumorigenesis.
We thank Dr. Takehiko Nohmi (NIHS, Japan) for providing the gpt delta transgenic mice. We thank Dr. Nan Mei for statistical analysis of mutation spectra of gpt gene.
This work was supported by the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China .
- Vanherweghem JL, Depierreux M, Tielemans C, Abramowicz D, Dratwa M, Jadoul M, et al. Rapidly progressive interstitial renal fibrosis in young women: association with slimming regimen including Chinese herbs. Lancet. 1993;341(8842):387–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nortier JL, Martinez MC, Schmeiser HH, Arlt VM, Bieler CA, Petein M, et al. Urothelial carcinoma associated with the use of a Chinese herb (Aristolochia fangchi). N Engl J Med. 2000;342(23):1686–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grollman AP, Shibutani S, Moriya M, Miller F, Wu L, Moll U, et al. Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(29):12129–34.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CH, Dickman KG, Moriya M, Zavadil J, Sidorenko VS, Edwards KL, et al. Aristolochic acid-associated urothelial cancer in Taiwan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(21):8241–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grosse Y, Baan R, Straif K, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al. A review of human carcinogens-Part A: pharmaceuticals. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):13–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shibutani S, Bonala RR, Rosenquist T, Rieger R, Suzuki N, Johnson F, et al. Detoxification of aristolochic acid I by O-demethylation: less nephrotoxicity and genotoxicity of aristolochic acid Ia in rodents. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(5):1021–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan W, Cui L, Xu G, Cai Z. Study of the phase I and phase II metabolism of nephrotoxin aristolochic acid by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20(11):1755–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan W, Luo HB, Zheng Y, Cheng YK, Cai Z. Investigation of the metabolism and reductive activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acids in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35(6):866–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arlt VM, Stiborova M, Schmeiser HH. Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer hazard in herbal remedies: a review. Mutagenesis. 2002;17(4):265–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Arlt VM, Roufosse CA, McKim KL, Myers MB, Phillips DH, et al. ACB-PCR measurement of H-ras codon 61 CAA->CTA mutation provides an early indication of aristolochic acid I carcinogenic effect in tumor target tissues. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012;53(7):495–504.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmeiser HH, Scherf HR, Wiessler M. Activating mutations at codon 61 of the c-Ha-ras gene in thin-tissue sections of tumors induced by aristolochic acid in rats and mice. Cancer Lett. 1991;59(2):139–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmeiser HH, Janssen JW, Lyons J, Scherf HR, Pfau W, Buchmann A, et al. Aristolochic acid activates ras genes in rat tumors at deoxyadenosine residues. Cancer Res. 1990;50(17):5464–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stiborova M, Levova K, Barta F, Shi Z, Frei E, Schmeiser HH, et al. Bioactivation versus detoxication of the urothelial carcinogen aristolochic acid I by human cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1A2. Toxicol Sci. 2012;125(2):345–58.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue X, Xiao Y, Zhu H, Wang H, Liu Y, Xie T, et al. Induction of P450 1A by 3-methylcholanthrene protects mice from aristolochic acid-I-induced acute renal injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(10):3074–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiao Y, Ge M, Xue X, Wang C, Wang H, Wu X, et al. Hepatic cytochrome P450s metabolize aristolochic acid and reduce its kidney toxicity. Kidney Int. 2008;73(11):1231–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosenquist TA, Einolf HJ, Dickman KG, Wang L, Smith A, Grollman AP. Cytochrome P450 1A2 detoxicates aristolochic acid in the mouse. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(5):761–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arlt VM, Levova K, Barta F, Shi Z, Evans JD, Frei E, et al. Role of P450 1A1 and P450 1A2 in bioactivation versus detoxication of the renal carcinogen aristolochic acid I: studies in Cyp1a1−/−, Cyp1a2−/−, and Cyp1a1/1a2−/− mice. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24(10):1710–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levova K, Moserova M, Kotrbova V, Sulc M, Henderson CJ, Wolf CR, et al. Role of cytochromes P450 1A1/2 in detoxication and activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acid I: studies with the hepatic NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase null (HRN) mouse model. Toxicol Sci. 2011;121(1):43–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levova K, Moserova M, Nebert DW, Phillips DH, Frei E, Schmeiser HH, et al. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase expression in Cyp1a-knockout and CYP1A-humanized mouse lines and its effect on bioactivation of the carcinogen aristolochic acid I. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;265(3):360–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luan Y, Xing G, Qi X, Wu M, Li C, Yao J, et al. The application of hepatic P450 reductase null gpt delta mice in studying the role of hepatic P450 in genotoxic carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced mutagenesis. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86(11):1753–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalscheuer S, Zhang X, Zeng Y, Upadhyaya P. Differential expression of microRNAs in early-stage neoplastic transformation in the lungs of F344 rats chronically treated with the tobacco carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(12):2394–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xing G, Qi X, Chen M, Wu Y, Yao J, Gong L, et al. Comparison of the mutagenicity of aristolochic acid I and aristolochic acid II in the gpt delta transgenic mouse kidney. Mutat Res. 2012;743(1–2):52–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cariello NF. Software for the analysis of mutations at the human hprt gene. Mutat Res. 1994;312(2):173–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams WT, Skopek TR. Statistical test for the comparison of samples from mutational spectra. J Mol Biol. 1987;194(3):391–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mengs U. Tumour induction in mice following exposure to aristolochic acid. Arch Toxicol. 1988;61(6):504–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jerabek P, Martinek V, Stiborova M. Theoretical investigation of differences in nitroreduction of aristolochic acid I by cytochromes P450 1A1, 1A2 and 1B1. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2012;33 Suppl 3:25–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stiborova M, Frei E, Schmeiser HH. Biotransformation enzymes in development of renal injury and urothelial cancer caused by aristolochic acid. Kidney Int. 2008;73(11):1209–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stiborova M, Martinek V, Frei E, Arlt VM, Schmeiser HH. Enzymes metabolizing aristolochic acid and their contribution to the development of aristolochic acid nephropathy and urothelial cancer. Curr Drug Metab. 2013;14(6):695–705.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stiborova M, Mares J, Levova K, Pavlickova J, Barta F, Hodek P, et al. Role of cytochromes P450 in metabolism of carcinogenic aristolochic acid I: evidence of their contribution to aristolochic acid I detoxication and activation in rat liver. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32 Suppl 1:121–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arlt VM, Singh R, Stiborova M, Gamboa da Costa G, Frei E, Evans JD, et al. Effect of hepatic cytochrome P450 (P450) oxidoreductase deficiency on 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine-DNA adduct formation in P450 reductase conditional null mice. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(12):2169–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mengs U, Klein M. Genotoxic effects of aristolochic acid in the mouse micronucleus test. Planta Med. 1988;54(6):502–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mengs U. On the histopathogenesis of rat forestomach carcinoma caused by aristolochic acid. Arch Toxicol. 1983;52(3):209–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cui M, Liu ZH, Qiu Q, Li H, Li LS. Tumour induction in rats following exposure to short-term high dose aristolochic acid I. Mutagenesis. 2005;20(1):45–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.