Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the count results of the manual counting and the MN/cell detection software

From: Application of image-recognition techniques to automated micronucleus detection in the in vitro micronucleus assay

Sample

(µg/mL)

Number of photographs

Manual counting

Cell/MN counting software

Cell viability

Initial analysis

Individual reanalysis

Batch reanalysis

Total cells

MN cells

MN

Total cells

MN cells

MN

Total cells

MN cells

MN

Total cells

MN cells

MN

(n)

(n)

(%)

(n)

(n)

(%)

(n)

(n)

(%)

(n)

(n)

(%)

(%)

Control

0

45

1555

11

0.71

1548

13

0.84

1549

16

1.03

1593

23

1.44

100

H2O2

3.75

55

1340

35

2.61

1352

155***

11.46

1352

32

2.37

1352

25

1.85

71

7.5

57

1292

68

5.26

1336

91*

6.81

1297

72

5.55

1334

60

4.50

66

15

43

1250

95

7.60

1262

93

7.37

1262

93

7.37

1262

93

7.37

84

30

79

2040

189

9.26

2053

257*

12.52

2055

197

9.59

2093

197

9.41

75

K2CrO4

1.2

50

1353

36

2.66

1354

30

2.22

1354

31

2.29

1348

32

2.37

78

2.4

60

1436

91

6.34

1408

87

6.18

1408

89

6.32

1413

84

5.94

69

4.9

66

1270

139

10.94

1280

98*

7.66

1274

129

10.13

1299

118

9.08

56

MMC

0.0125

49

1919

62

3.23

1901

76

4.00

1896

68

3.59

1910

78

4.08

113

0.025

36

1661

69

4.15

1679

112**

6.67

1676

72

4.30

1688

62

3.67

134

0.05

30

1465

199

13.58

1456

225

15.45

1456

198

13.60

1497

183

12.22

141

0.1

80

1203

472

39.24

1172

464

39.59

1172

455

38.82

1182

448

37.90

44

0.2

65

1684

326

19.36

1682

378

22.47

1688

319

18.90

1704

321

18.84

75

MMS

10

49

1658

76

4.58

1642

80

4.87

1639

68

4.15

1647

90

5.46

98

20

50

1147

106

9.24

1145

115

10.04

1143

116

10.15

1123

113

10.06

66

40

73

1347

250

18.56

1363

257

18.86

1359

239

17.59

1361

257

18.88

53

80

187

1155

50

4.33

1136

135***

11.88

1136

52

4.58

1149

58

5.05

18

  1. MN (%) meant the percentage of micronucleus-containing cells in the total cells
  2. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.005 showed significant differences between the number of detections by the MN/cell detection software and the number of detections by manual counting in the same chemical concentration image group by Student’s t-test