Skip to main content

Antimutagenic components in Spatholobus suberectus Dunn against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea

Abstract

Background

An extract from Spatholobus suberectus (S. suberectus) Dunn has been reported to show potent antimutagenic effects against N-alkyl-N-nitrosoureas in umu screening. The aim of this study was to identify the antimutagenic components from extracts of S. suberectus against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1535 and to elucidate the antimutagenic mechanism of the flavonoids.

Results

From the ethyl acetate fraction obtained from fractionation of the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn, medicarpin, formononetin and isoliquiritigenin were successfully isolated through a combination of normal- and reversed-phase chromatography. Genistein and naringenin, which were already reported to be contained in S. suberectus Dunn, were also tested for their antimutagenicity towards MNU, along with formononetin, isoliquiritigenin and medicarpin. Our results demonstrated that genistein, isoliquiritigenin, medicarpin and naringenin were antimutagenic against MNU without showing cytotoxicity. MNU is reported to cause not only DNA alkylation but also induce reactive oxygen species. The hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of the flavonoids was correlated with the antimutagenic capacity, indicating that the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was involved in their antimutagenicity towards MNU.

Conclusions

It is important to prevent DNA damage by N-nitrosamines for cancer chemoprevention. Genistein, isoliquiritigenin, medicarpin and naringenin were demonstrated to possess an antigenotoxic effects against carcinogenic MNU due to their radical scavenging activity.

Introduction

N-Nitroso compounds, are implicated as carcinogens in the human environment such as food, tobacco smoke, air, water and cosmetics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In addition, N-nitroso compounds have been reported to be formed endogenously, mainly in the stomach and bowel, or in an infection site [2]. The endogenous formation of N-nitrosamines is a possible explanation for the epidemiological connection of gastrointestinal cancers [7, 8]. Therefore, for chemoprevention, it is important to discover naturally occurring or synthetic compounds that can prevent the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of N-nitrosamines.

N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) is a direct-acting mutagen that forms the corresponding methyldiazohydroxides and methylates DNA to form DNA adducts that miscode during DNA replication, causing mutations that lead to tumour formation. MNU is formed by the nitrosation of methylurea with nitrite in guinea-pig stomachs, and MNU is absorbed from the stomach into the blood [9]. Additionally, MNU can be detected by the nitrosation of creatinine or fermented foods at gastric pH [10,11,12]. Therefore, for cancer chemoprevention, it is important to find some compounds that can inhibit the mutagenicity induced by MNU.

Spatholobus suberect (S. suberectus) Dunn (Leguminosae) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine used to treat rheumatism, anaemia, menoxenia, and other disorders [13]. Pharmacologically, it exhibits anti-inflammatory [14, 15] and antitumour activities [16, 17]. Our previous study showed that an aqueous extract of S. suberectus Dunn showed the most potent antimutagenic effects against MNU by umu test screening [18].

The umu test is a convenient method because the data are obtained in a short period of time; however, the Ames test is a more precise method to evaluate the genotoxic activities of a wide variety of environmental carcinogens and mutagens than the umu test [19, 20]. The Ames test using bacterial strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) is widely used by regulatory agencies, academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies to assess the mutagenic potential of compounds [21, 22]. In the present study, we identified antimutagens against MNU using the Ames assay, and the inhibitory mechanism was investigated.

Materials and methods

General experimental procedures

The reaction progress was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel 60 F254 (0.25 mm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (0.04–0.063 mm, Merck). Melting points were determined using a Yanaco (Tokyo, Japan) micro-melting point apparatus without correction. The LC system used was equipped with an LC-6 AD pump (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), a UVDEC-100 V spectrometric detector (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan), a YRD-880 IR detector (Shimamura Tech. Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), or a SPD-20A (Shimadzu), and a Capcell pack RP-18 column (Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan). NMR spectra were recorded with a JEOL JNM-LA400 spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). The chemical shifts were expressed as ppm downfield from TMS. The mass spectra were measured on a JEOL JMS-SX102A mass spectrometer. The ESR spectra were collected on a JEOL JES-X320.

Reagents

Bacto agar and Bacto nutrient broth were obtained from Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems (Sparks, USA). 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and ethylenediamine-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA) were purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). Sodium ammonium hydrogen phosphate tetrahydrate was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). S. suberectus Dunn was purchased from Matsumoto Yakugyo Co., Ltd. (Nagoya, Japan). Genistein [mp. 304 °C (decomp.), recrystallized from ethanol and H2O] and isoliquiritigenin [mp. 197 °C, recrystallized from ethanol and chloroform] were obtained from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Formononetin (mp. 256 °C) and naringenin (mp. 251 °C) was purchased from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (Minnesota, USA). All reagents used were of the best commercially available quality from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan) and were not further purified unless otherwise noted. Medicarpin (mp. 194 °C) was synthesized according to the method of Goel et al [23]. MNU [mp. 106 °C (decomp.) was prepared as described previously [24]. Purity of the synthesized medicarpin and MNU were determined by the 1H-NMR spectra, which all required integral values matches the number of protons without any other peak.

Preparation of the aqueous extract of S. suberectus Dunn

Dried S. suberectus Dunn was cut with a pair of scissors. Distilled water (130 mL) was added to the cut S. suberectus Dunn (30 g) and refluxed for 30 min. The mixture was filtered with suction, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The whole procedure was repeated twice. The crude extracts were combined, dried under vacuum, and finally gave a reddish solid (5.30 g).

Preparation of the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn

Dried S. suberectus Dunn was cut with a pair of scissors. Methanol (130 mL) was added to the cut S. suberectus Dunn (30 g) and stirred for 30 min at room temperature. The mixture was filtered with suction, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The whole procedure was repeated twice. The crude extracts were combined, dried under vacuum, and finally a reddish solid (2.32 g) was obtained.

Fractionation of the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn based on the solubility in organic solvents

Methanol (3.5 L) was added to the cut S. suberectus Dunn (1 kg) and incubated overnight at room temperature. The mixture was filtered with suction, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The whole procedure was repeated 5 times. The crude extracts were combined, dried under vacuum, and finally a reddish solid (162 g) was obtained. Ethyl acetate (300 mL) and water (300 mL) were added to the solid, and the aqueous phase was separated. The aqueous phase was re-extracted with ethyl acetate (150 mL × 6), and the combined organic phases were washed with water (100 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with water-saturated n-butanol (150 mL × 6), and the combined organic phases were washed with n-butanol-saturated water (100 mL). The ethyl acetate, n-butanol and aqueous extracts were filtered, and the filtrates were removed of solvent with a rotary evaporator, and the residue was dried in vacuo. Finally, the ethyl acetate fraction (23.8 g), n-butanol fraction (48.0 g), and aqueous fraction (86.0 g) were obtained from the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn. The recovery of the weight was 97%.

Isolation of antimutagenic compounds from the ethyl acetate fraction

From the ethyl acetate fraction obtained from the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn, medicarpin, formononetin and isoliquiritigenin were successfully isolated through a combination of normal and reversed systems of chromatography (see the additional file 1). The three purified compounds were characterized by comparing their spectroscopic properties with literature values.

Bacterial mutation assay

The antimutagenic effect of each plant extract was assayed according to the Ames method using the plate-incorporation protocol [21, 22]. Dr. T. Nohmi (National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) kindly provided the S. typhimurium TA1535.

A solution of MNU (1.5 μmol/50 μL of DMSO) was added to a test tube and supplemented with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.5 mL), a solution (50 μL) with various concentrations of each fraction, and a culture of S. typhimurium TA1535 (0.1 mL), and the solution was thoroughly mixed. Then, top agar (2 mL) was added, and the mixture was poured onto a minimal-glucose agar plate. The revertant colonies were counted after incubation at 37 °C for 44 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times with similar results. The results are expressed as the mean ± SE. Plates with neither MNU nor plant extract were considered negative controls. MNU (1.5 μmol/50 μL) resulted in 1826 ± 52 colonies. All of the tested plates were microscopically examined for thinning, the absence of a background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, which are considered indicators of toxicity induced by the test material. Neither MNU nor the plant extracts displayed toxicity to S. typhimurium TA1535 under the conditions of the antimutagenicity test.

Mutagenic activity in the presence of the extracts is expressed as the percent of mutagenicity (% = Rs/R × 100), where Rs is the number of his+ revertants/plate for plates exposed to MNU and plant extracts, and R is the number of his+ revertants/plate of MNU. The number of spontaneous revertants was subtracted beforehand to give Rs and R. Thus, the mutagenicity of MNU in the absence of plant extracts was defined as 100% MNU mutagenicity.

Cytotoxicity test

Toxicity assays under the same conditions as those used for the Ames test were performed to determine the maximum concentrations of each plant extract that could be added without exerting toxic effects on the bacteria used in the Ames test. A solution of MNU (1.5 μmol/50 μL of DMSO) was added to a test tube and supplemented with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.5 mL), each solution of plant extract (50 μL), and a culture of S. typhimurium TA1535 (0.1 mL). A portion of the mixture was diluted 105-fold times in 1/15 M PB. The diluted solution (200 μL) was supplemented with histidine-free top agar (2 mL) and poured on a nutrient broth agar plate. The colonies were counted after incubation at 37 °C for 20 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times with similar results. The results are expressed as the mean ± SE. A substance was considered cytotoxic when the bacterial survival was less than 80% of that observed in the negative control [25]. The mutation frequency was estimated as the number of mutants per 107 surviving bacterial cells.

Reaction with MNU and isoliquiritigenin

A solution of MNU (1.5 μmol/50 μL of DMSO) was added to a test tube and supplemented with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.6 mL) and a solution of isoliquiritigenin (0.5 mg/50 μL of DMSO). DMSO (50 μL) was used instead of the isoliquiritigenin solution for the blank. The reaction conditions were similar to those of the mutation assay, although 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 mL) was used instead of a bacterial culture (0.1 mL). A portion of the mixture was diluted 10-fold in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at specified intervals and the solution (1 μL) was injected into HPLC.

The kinetics of the reactions were followed by monitoring of the MNU peak by HPLC. A plot of [MNU] versus time gave a straight line with a slope of –k. The half-life was calculated from ln2/k. Experiments were repeated four times with similar results. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD.

MNU was determined using HPLC with a Shiseido capcell pack UG80 (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm) column with 8% methanol–H2O as the eluent at 0.7 mL/min and 254 nm.

Isoliquiritigenin was determined using HPLC with a Shiseido capcell pack UG80 (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm) column with 60% methanol–H2O as the eluent at 0.7 mL/min and 323 nm.

Detection of DMPO-OH adducts by ESR spectroscopy

Each flavonoid was diluted in acetonitrile. To a test tube containing 0.9 M DMPO (10 μL, final conc. 40.9 mM), flavonoid (each concentration in 33 μL), 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 147 μL), 20 mM EDTA (10 μL, final conc. 0.91 mM) and 10 mM FeSO4 (10 μL, final conc. 0.45 mM) was added 10 mM H2O2 (10 μL, final conc. 0.45 mM), followed by mixing on a vortex mixer and then transferring to an aqueous flat-cell. Acetonitrile (33 μL) was used instead of compound solution for the blank. Further increasing the dose of flavonoid resulted in precipitation in the reaction mixture.

After 2 min, the ESR spectrum was acquired using the following parameters: magnetic field of 336.0 ± 5.0 mT, microwave power of 1.0 mW, modulation frequency of 9.42 GHz, modulation width of 0.05 mT, sweep time of 30 s, response time of 0.03 s, and receiver gain of 250. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD.

The capacity of the OH scavenging activity at each flavonoid concentration was presented as a relative intensity determined by calculating the peak height of the ESR signal due to the OH adduct of DMPO (DMPO–OH). The OH scavenging activity in the presence of flavonoids is expressed as the percent of OH scavenging activity [% = (R-Rs)/R × 100], where Rs is the DMPO-OH adduct intensity in the presence of flavonoid and R is the DMPO-OH adduct intensity in the absence of flavonoid.

Results and discussion

Identification of the main component from the antimutagenic fractions

The aqueous fraction of S. suberectus Dunn inhibited MNU-induced mutagenicity in preliminary screening using the umu test. To identify the antimutagenic component, the antimutagenic activity against MNU was compared among aqueous and methanol extracts (Fig. 1). The aqueous and methanol extraction yields were 10.6 and 4.6%, respectively. The methanol extract had a lower extraction yield; however, the antimutagenic activity in the methanol extract (40%) was better than that in the aqueous extract (25%) at a dose of 20 mg/plate on S. typhimurium TA1535.

Fig. 1
figure1

Effect of the extracts of S. suberectus Dunn on MNU-induced mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA1535

The methanol fraction was sequentially partitioned into ethyl acetate, n-butanol and the residuals. Among these fractions, the ethyl acetate fraction (60% inhibition) showed the highest antimutagenic activity against MNU at a dose of 15 mg/plate in S. typhimurium TA1535 (Fig. 2). Therefore, the ethyl acetate fraction was separated through a combination of normal and reversed phases of chromatography (Fig. 3, additional file 1). In each fractionation step, the recoveries of the weights were more than 85% (see the additional file 1).

Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of the fractions from the methanolic extracts of S. suberectus Dunn on MNU-induced mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA1535

Fig. 3
figure3

Structures of flavonoids from S. suberectus Dunn

The methanol extract and its ethyl acetate fraction have appropriate polarity to yield a flavonoid-rich fraction [26]. In our study, the ethyl acetate fraction was prepared by partitioning the methanol extract of S. suberectus Dunn, which possessed the highest antimutagenicity, assuming that the antimutagens were flavonoids. Finally, three flavonoids were isolated and identified as formononetin, isoliquiritigenin and medicarpin, and these flavonoids have been reported to be isolated from S. suberectus Dunn [27, 28].

Inhibitory effect of the components of S. suberectus Dunn on MNU-induced mutagenicity

Formononetin, isoliquiritigenin, and medicarpin were evaluated for their ability to inhibit MNU-induced mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA1535 (Fig. 3). Additionally, genistein and naringenin were tested for their antimutagenicity towards MNU (Fig. 3). Genistein and naringenin have already been isolated from S. suberectus Dunn and are commercially available [29, 30].

In the cytotoxicity assays, samples with values of > 80% viable cells were considered non-toxic compared with the viability of the negative control [25]. In this study, no cell toxic effects were observed at a concentration of 1.0 mg/plate for formononetin and naringenin and 0.5 mg/plate for genistein, isoliquiritigenin and medicarpin. To assess the precise antimutagenic potency of the plant extracts, the mutation frequency mutagenicity was calculated by dividing the number of mutants with the surviving fraction of bacteria. These data clearly showed that genistein, isoliquiritigenin, medicarpin and naringenin possessed antimutagenic activity against MNU in S. typhimurium TA1535 (Fig. 4). The antimutagenic activity of the flavonoids was of the following order: isoliquiritigenin > genistein > medicarpin = naringenin. Formononetin did not show antimutagenicity against MNU.

Fig. 4
figure4

Mutagenicity (A), survival rate (B), and mutation frequency (C) of flavonoids on MNU-induced mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA1535. The SE bars were too small to show

Flavonoids are well-known antimutagens that have been detected by Ames assays [31, 32], and there are several reports that use MNU as a mutagen [33]. Although genistein has been reported to inhibit MNU-induced mutagenicity, we also tested for its antimutagenicity towards MNU to compare with those of the other isolated flavonoids [34]. Naringenin has been reported to have antimutagenic activity against the indirect-mutagen aflatoxin B1 through inhibition of metabolic activating enzymes, but it did not show antimutagenicity against the direct-acting N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine [35]. In this study, naringenin inhibited MNU-induced mutagenicity, which is the reason why the higher concentration of naringenin was used.

For the first time, isoliquiritigenin, naringenin and medicarpin were demonstrated to possess antimutagenic activity against MNU. These flavonoids have been reported to have anticancer activity [36,37,38,39], and the antimutagenic activity was considered to contribute to their anticancer activity.

Hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity of the flavonoids derived from S. suberectus Dunn

The antimutagenic mechanism of the flavonoids in the Salmonella assay was reported to be by inhibition of enzymatic activation [40], induction of the SOS response [41], and the reaction between flavonoids and the metabolic antimutagenic-activating mutagen [42]. In this study, the direct-acting MNU was used, and the activity was evaluated using S. typhimurium TA1535, which did not contain the plasmid pKM101 [43]. Therefore, the inhibitory effect on the mutagenicity of direct-acting mutagens was thought to be caused by a chemical reaction between MNU and the flavonoids. The half-lives of MNU in the presence or absence of isoliquiritigenin were compared, and the results were 21.0 ± 1.2 min and 20.0 ± 2.3 min, respectively. Furthermore, we could not detect any new product from a reaction mixture of MNU and isoliquiritigenin, and no significant change in the amount of isoliquiritigenin was observed by HPLC. These data indicated that isoliquiritigenin did not decompose MNU and did not scavenge on an electrophilic product generated from MNU in vitro.

MNU treatments have been reported to induce not only DNA alkylation but also increase intracellular ROS levels [44, 45]. Therefore, five flavonoids were evaluated for their antioxidant activities using a hydroxyl radical (OH)-scavenging assay (Fig. 5). To investigate the reaction of OH with flavonoids, the electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trapping technique was used [46]. The Fenton reaction (Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH + OH) was the source of OH [47], and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) was used as the OH-trapping agent [48]. The capacity of the OH-scavenging activity is presented as the inhibition percent (%) relative to the intensity of the DMPO-OH adduct (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

OH-scavenging activity of flavonoids

Genistein, isoliquiritigenin, medicarpin and naringenin, which possess antimutagenic activity, inhibited the formation of the DMPO-OH adduct. Formononetin, which did not have antimutagenic activity towards MNU, showed very low OH-scavenging activities. These data indicated that antimutagenic activity against MNU-induced mutagenicity had the same tendency as the OH-scavenging activity.

Despite the fact that flavonoids scavenged OH, there were no significant changes in the amount of isoliquiritigenin in a reaction with MNU in a test tube. As a small amount of extracellular ROS was generated from MNU [44], the decrease of isoliquiritigenin was hard to detect.

Many studies have reported OH-scavenging activity of flavonoids [49] and the structure-activity relationship for free radical scavenging activity [50]. Furthermore, Makhafola et al. reported a direct correlation with antioxidant activity and antimutagenicity towards 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide [51]. Our results demonstrated that the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of flavonoids was involved in their antimutagenicity against direct-acting MNU in the Ames assay with strain S. typhimurium TA1535. Since antimutagenicity of flavonoids toward MNU was significantly effective (approximately 100% inhibition), there are possibilities to have other antimutagenic mechanism. The flavonoids may block the reaction between methyldiazonium ion and DNA due to the interaction with DNA and flavonoids [52, 53]. Further investigation is required to quantify O6-methylguanine, which is mutagenic DNA adducts induced by MNU, in a reaction of flavonoids and DNA.

Conclusions

It is important to prevent DNA damage by N-nitrosamines for cancer chemoprevention. In the present study, four components with antimutagenic activity against MNU from S. suberectus Dunn were identified as genistein, isoliquiritigenin, medicarpin, and naringenin. Isoliquiritigenin was the most active component of S. suberectus Dunn in inhibiting MNU-induced mutagenicity. This report describes the first demonstration of the antigenotoxic effects of these components against carcinogenic MNU.

Many flavonoids are known to have a bioactive effect on human health [54], and the dietary intake of flavonoids has been reported to reduce the risk of developing cancer, such as gastric, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers [55]. The radical scavenging potency of flavonoids might be involved in their chemopreventive effects.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Lijinsky W. Chemistry and biology of N-nitroso compounds. Cambridge Monographs on Cancer Research: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kobayashi J. Effect of diet and gut environment on the gastrointestinal formation of N-nitroso compounds: a review. Nitric Oxide. 2018;73:66–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Park J, Seo J, Lee J, Kwon H. Distribution of seven N-nitrosamines in food. Toxicol Res. 2015;31(3):279–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Haorah J, Zhou L, Wang X, Xu G, Mirvish SS. Determination of total N-nitroso compounds and their precursors in frankfurters, fresh meat, dried salted fish, sauces, tobacco, and tobacco smoke particulates. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:6068–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hutchings JW, Ervens B, Straub D, Herckes P. N-Nitrosodimethylamine occurrence, formation and cycling in clouds and fogs. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(21):8128–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lim DS, Lim SK, Kim MK, Kwon YC, Roh TH, Choi SM, Yoon S, Kim HS, Lee BM. Formation and inhibition of N-nitrosodiethanolamine in cosmetics under pH, temperature, and fluorescent, ultraviolet, and visual light. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2018;81(9):241–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Catsburg CE, Gago-Dominguez M, Yuan JM, Castelao JE, Cortessis VK, Pike MC, et al. Stern MC. Dietary sources of N-nitroso compounds and bladder cancer risk: findings from the Los Angeles bladder cancer study. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:125–35.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    DellaValle CT, Daniel CR, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Hollenbeck AR, Cross AJ, Sinha R, et al. Dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite and risk of renal cell carcinoma in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:205–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Engemann A, Focke C, Humpf HU. Intestinal formation of N-nitroso compounds in the pig cecum model. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:998–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sen NP, Seaman SW, Burgess C, Baddoo PA, Weber D. Investigation on the possible formation of N-nitroso-N-methylurea by nitrosation of creatinine in model systems and in cured meats at gastric pH. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:5088–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deng D, Li T, Ma H, Wang R, Gu L, Zhou J. Characterization of N-(nitrosomethyl) urea in nitrosated fermented fish products. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sen NP, Seaman SW, Baddoo PA, Burgess C, Weber D. Formation of N-nitroso-N-methylurea in various samples of smoked/dried fish, fish sauce, seafoods, and ethnic fermented/pickled vegetables following incubation with nitrite under acidic conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:2096–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Qin S, Wu L, Wei K, Liang Y, Song Z, Zhou X, Wang S, Li M, Wu Q, Zhang K, Yuanyuan H, Wang S, Miao J, Zhang ZA. A draft genome for Spatholobus suberectus. Scientific Data. 2019;6:113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hsu CC, Hsu CL, Tsai SE, Fu TY, Yen GC. Protective effect of Millettia reticulata Benth against CCl4-induced hepatic damage and inflammatory action in rats. J Med Food. 2009;12(4):821–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goda Y, Shibuya M, Sankawa U. Inhibitors of prostaglandin biosynthesis from Mucuna birdwoodiana. Chem Pharm Bull. 1987;35(7):2675–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liu B, Liu J, Chen J, Zhu D, Zhou H, Wang X. A study on anticancer activity of Caulis Spatholobi extract on human osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013;10:256–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang ZY, Wang DM, Loo TY, Cheng Y, Chen LL, Shen JG, Yang DP, Chow LW, Guan XY, Chen JP. Spatholobus suberectus inhibits cancer cell growth by inducing apoptosis and arresting cell cycle at G2/M checkpoint. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;133(2):751–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Inami K, Takada M, Itoh K, Ishikawa S, Mochizuki M. Assessment of the antimutagenic effects of aqueous extracts from herbal medicines against N-nitroso-N-alkylureas induced mutagenicity using the umu test. Genes and Environ. 2014;36(2):33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Oda Y, Nakamura S, Oki I, Kato T, Shinagawa H. Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens. Mutat Res. 1985;147:219–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Caillet S, Lessard S, Lamoureux G, Lacroix M. Umu test applied for screening natural antimutagenic agents. Food Chem. 2011;124:1699–707.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Maron DM, Ames BN. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1983;113:173–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mortelmans K, Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res. 2000;455:29–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goel A, Kumar A, Hemberger Y, Raghuvanshi A, Jeet R, Tiwari G, Knauer M, Kureel J, Singh AK, Gautam A, Trivedi R, Singh D, Bringmann G. Synthesis, optical resolution, absolute configuration, and osteogenic activity of cis-pterocarpans. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10(48):9583–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Arndt F, Amstutz ED, Myers RR, “Organic Syntheses”, ed. by Blatt AH, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1943, Coll. Vol. 2, p.461.

  25. 25.

    Horn RC, Vargas VMF. Antimutagenic activity of extracts of natural substances in the Salmonella/microsome assay. Mutagenesis. 2003;18(2):113–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shabbir M, Khan MR, Saeed N. Assessment of phytochemicals, antioxidant, anti-lipid peroxidation and anti-hemolytic activity of extract and various fractions of Maytenus royleanus leaves. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:143.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fu Y, Jiang L, Zhao W, Xi-nan M, Huang S, Yang J, Hu T, Chen H. Immunomodulatory and antioxidant effects of total flavonoids of Spatholobus suberectus Dunn on PCV2 infected mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8676.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yoon JS, Sung SH, Park JH, Kim YC. Flavonoids from Spatholobus suberectus. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27(6):589–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fang S, Hsu C, Lin H, Yen G. Anticancer effects of flavonoid derivatives isolated from Millettia reticulata Benth in SK-Hep-1 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:814–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tang RN, Qu XB, Guan SH, Xu PP, Shi YY, Guo DA. Chemical constituents of Spatholobus suberectus. Chin J Nat Med. 2012;10(1):32–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Izquierdo-Vega JA, Morales-González JA, Sánchez-Gutiérrez M, Betanzos-Cabrera G, Sosa-Delgado SM, Sumaya-Martínez MT, Morales-González Á, Paniagua-Pérez R, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Madrigal-Santillán E. Evidence of some natural products with antigenotoxic Eeffects. Part 1: Fruits and polysaccharides. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):102.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gautam S, Saxena S, Kumar S. Fruits and vegetables as dietary sources of Antimutagens. J Food Chem Nanotechnol. 2016;2(3):97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gichner T, Pospísil F, Velemínský J, Volkeová V, Volke J. Two types of antimutagenic effects of gallic and tannic acids towards N-nitroso-compounds-induced mutagenicity in the Ames Salmonella assay. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1987;32(1):55–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Polívková Z, Langová M, Šmerák P, Bártová B, Bárta I. Antimutagenic effect of genistein. Czech J Food Sci. 2006;24:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Choi JS, Park KY, Moon SH, Rhee SH, Young HS. Antimutagenic effect of plant flavonoids in the Salmonella assay system. Arch Pharm Res. 1994;17(2):71–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang B, Lai Y, Li Y, Shu N, Wang Z, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen Z. Antineoplastic activity of isoliquiritigenin, a chalcone compound, in androgen-independent human prostate cancer cells linked to G2/M cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;821:57–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Peng F, Du Q, Peng C, Wang N, Tang H, Xie X, Shen J, Chen J. A review: the pharmacology of isoliquiritigenin. Phytother Res. 2015;29(7):969–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Trivedi R, Maurya R, Mishra DP. Medicarpin, a legume phytoalexin sensitizes myeloid leukemia cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the induction of DR5 and activation of the ROS-JNK-CHOP pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1465.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Venkateswara RP, Kiran SDVS, Rohini P, Bhagyasree P. Flavonoid: a review on naringenin. J Pharm Phytochem. 2017;6(5):2778–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nakahara K, Roy MK, Ono H, Maeda I, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Yoshida M, Trakoontivakorn G. Prenylated flavanones isolated from flowers of Azadirachta indica (the Neem tree) as antimutagenic constituents against heterocyclic amines. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(22):6456–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Miyazawa M, Okuno Y, Fukuyama M, Nakamura S, Kosaka H. Antimutagenic activity of polymethoxyflavonoids from Citrus aurantium. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:5239–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang M, Wood AW, Newmark HL, Sayer JM, Yagi H, Jerina DM, Conney AH. Inhibition of the mutagenicity of bay-region diol epoxides of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by naturally occurring plant phenols: exceptional activity of ellagic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(18):5513–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    McCann J, Spingarn NE, Kobori J, Ames BN. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens: bacterial tester strains with R factor plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72(3):979–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hebels DG, Briedé JJ, Khampang R, Kleinjans JC, de Kok TM. Radical mechanisms in nitrosamine- and nitrosamide-induced whole-genome gene expression modulations in Caco-2 cells. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116:194–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tsuruma K, Yamauchi M, Inokuchi Y, Sugitani S, Shimazawa M, Hara H. Role of oxidative stress in retinal photoreceptor cell death in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-treated mice. J Pharmacol Sci. 2012;118:351–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Huang D, Qu B, Prior RL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:1841–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Goldstein S, Meyerstein D, Czapski G. The Fenton reagents. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;15:435–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Buettner GR. Spin trapping: ESR parameters of spin adducts. Free Radic Biol Med. 1987;3:259–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Treml J, Šmejkal K. Flavonoids as potent scavengers of hydroxyl radicals. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016;15:720–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20(7):933–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Makhafola TJ, Elgorashi EE, McGaw LJ, Verschaeve L, Eloff JN. The correlation between antimutagenic activity and total phenolic content of extracts of 31 plant species with high antioxidant activity. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16(1):490.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sohn SJ, Huh IH, Au WW, Heo MY. Antigenotoxicity of galangin against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Mutat Res. 1998;402:231–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Khan MS, Qais FA, Ahmad I, Hussain A, Alajmi MF. Genotoxicity inhibition by Syzygium cumini (L.) seed fraction and rutin: understanding the underlying mechanism of DNA protection. Toxicol Res. 2018;7:156–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci World J. 2013:162750.

  55. 55.

    Rodríguez-García C, Sánchez-Quesada C, Gaforio JJ. Dietary flavonoids as cancer chemopreventive agents: an updated review of human studies. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019;8(5):137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by a Grant-in-Aid for the Science Research Promotion Fund from the Japan Private School Promotion Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KI coordinated the study, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. YA separated the active fractions and performed the Ames assay. TH and NU evaluated the antimutagenicity of the isolated flavonoids against MNU and analysed the data. YO measured the radical scavenging activity and analysed the data. MM conceived of the study, participated in designing the study, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Inami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Antimutagenic components in Spatholobus suberectus Dunn against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inami, K., Asada, Y., Harada, T. et al. Antimutagenic components in Spatholobus suberectus Dunn against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Genes and Environ 41, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-019-0137-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antimutagenicity
  • Formononetin
  • Genistein
  • Isoliquiritigenin
  • Medicarpin
  • Naringenin
  • Hydroxyl radical