Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of apolipoprotein B XbaI (rs693) polymorphism and gallstone disease risk based on a comprehensive analysis

Genes and Environment volume 43, Article number: 17 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to investigate the association between XbaI gene polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene and gallstone disease (GD) risk through a comparison of the allele and genotype distribution frequencies at this site using meta-analysis.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Wanfang through Jun 1, 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of associations.

Results

After a comprehensive search, 14 different articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected, with 1583 cases and 1794 controls. Individuals carrying the A-allele or AA genotype of the rs693 polymorphism were determined to possibly have an increased risk of GD. For example, there was a significant relationship between the rs693 polymorphism and increased GD risk in the whole group (OR: 1.40, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.87 in the allelic contrast model), the Asian population (OR: 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.48–2.84 in the heterozygote model), and the hospital-based source of the control (OR: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.13–2.84 in the dominant model).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the APOB rs693 polymorphism is potentially associated with GD susceptibility, which might offer a detection marker for use in future large scale clinic research.

Background

Gallbladder disease (GD) is a highly prevalent condition affecting up to 15 % of the population with a significant health care burden in the United States [1,2,3]. Approximately 10–20 % of the population will develop GD in their lifetime [4], and women are more than twice as likely as men to develop the disease [5]. Based on current information using ultrasound surveys, ethnicity is a known risk factor; specifically, the highest rate of GD is found in Hispanic people from central and south American heritage [2, 3]. The north Indian population also shows a high incidence of GD, affecting 64.1 % women and 29.5 % men [2]. On the other hand, individuals of African American, African, and East-South Asian (China, Japan, India, and Thailand) descent show lower incidence of GD development [6].

Besides race, there are many other factors for GD development, such as advanced age, sex, and a hypercaloric diet rich in carbohydrates and poor in fiber. Additionally, obesity is one of the most important predisposing factor for GD. Other factors that affect the hepatic production of cholesterol, stasis/inflammation, bile acid production, or intestinal absorption of cholesterol and bile acids also contribute to GD development. Increasing evidence also points to genetic factors as being important for GD development [4, 7].

The apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene, presumably affecting the lipid composition and lipid metabolism [8, 9], plays an important role in GD development. The XbaI polymorphism site (rs693) is located in exon 26 of the APOB gene [10, 11], which is a synonymous variant. It is well known that synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are categorized as spurious events under no to modest selection through alterations to a nucleotide at a synonymous codon but retaining the encoded amino acid [12]. Synonymous SNPs are not randomly distributed across genes and preferentially target conserved sites [13]. In addition, synonymous mutations, which account for a larger proportion of somatic mutations detected in human pathology, play an important role in disease penetrance and are presumed to be driving mutations in some diseases [14], such as GD. The relationship between this polymorphism and GD has been examined in several studies; however, the conclusions have been unclear [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].

In a previous study, Niu et al. performed a meta-analysis and suggested that the rs693 polymorphism is significantly associated with higher levels of APOB, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Our current study comprised a similar meta-analysis, because GD is associated with the metabolism of TG, TC, and LDL-C [29]. To overcome factors such as sample size and regional and ethnic differences, our study summarized all published literature on the relationship between the XbaI polymorphism and GD based on meta-analysis, to comprehensively evaluate this relationship and provide an evidence-based medical basis for the etiology of GD.

Materials and methods

Literature search strategy

A computerized literature search was performed for relevant studies from PubMed and Wanfang published before Jun 1, 2020. The following keywords were jointly used: “Apolipoprotein B or APOB or Apo B,” “polymorphism or variation or mutation,” “rs693,” and “gallstone or cholelithiasis or biliary stone or bile duct stone.” If studies applied the same clinical case information, only the largest sample size was selected.

Inclusion criteria

The included studies met the following criteria: (a) clear criteria for the diagnosis of GD, such as B-ultrasound, CT, MRI, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, among others; (b) a correlation between GD risk and APOB gene rs693 polymorphism; (c) case-control or cohort design; (d) providing sufficient data for calculating the odds ratio (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI); (e) duplicate studies with the same cases; (f) the genotype distribution in the control group was in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) law.

Data extraction

The following information was extracted from each included study: name of the first author, publication year, country of origin, ethnicity, numbers of cases and controls, HWE of control group, genotyping method, and number of genotypes in cases and controls. The data were selected independently by two investigators who reached a consensus on all items.

Statistical analysis

The associations between the APOB rs693 polymorphism and risk of GD were estimated by calculating the OR and 95 % CI. The statistical significance of the OR [30] and the significance of the effect for the correlation were determined using Z test. The heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using Q test and I2 test as described previously [31, 32]. As a guide, I2 values < 25 % might be considered “low,” a value of ~ 50 % might be considered “moderate,” and values > 75 % might be considered “high” [33]. The Mantel-Haenszel (fixed effect) model was chosen, and otherwise, if Pheterogeneity < 0.1, the random effects (DerSimonian-Laird) model was applied [34, 35]. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken by removing each study once to assess whether any single study could influence the stability of results [36]. The departure of frequencies of the rs11200638 polymorphism from expectation under the HWE was assessed using Pearson’s χ2 test, and P < 0.05 was considered significant [37]. Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s regression test were performed to estimate the potential publication bias [38]. All statistical tests for this meta-analysis were performed using the Stata software, version 10.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Meta‐regression

Considering the subgroups of publication year, ethnicity, source of control as independent variables, and the log as a dependent variable, the random-effect meta-regression results were presented.

Protein-interaction network of the APOB gene

To more completely understand the role of APOB in GD, the gene–gene interaction network for APOB was predicted using the online String database (http://string-db.org/) [39].

Results

Study search and basic information

As depicted in Fig. 1 and 58 articles were gathered from PubMed (44 titles) and Wanfang (14 titles) databases. Moreover, 33 obviously irrelevant articles were excluded after screening the titles and abstract sections. The full texts were then evaluated, and 11 additional articles were further excluded as they were duplications (5); a meta-analysis, systematic analysis, or review (2); considered other gene polymorphisms (3); and associated with the risk of another disease (1). Finally, 14 different articles [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] met the inclusion criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Among these, eight were performed in China, two in Poland, one in India, one in the UK, and one in Japan. All included studies used blood samples for DNA extraction. In addition, all case-control studies about the rs693 polymorphism were consistent with the HWE in control groups (Table 1). In addition, we checked the minor allele frequency reported for the six main worldwide populations in the 1000 Genomes Browser (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs693) as follows: global (0.251); Europe (0.4423); East Asian (0.0615); South Asian (0.216); African (0.2095); American (0.378) (Fig. 2). In addition, we tested this polymorphism with respect to whether it influences the expression of APOB by analyzing different genotypes based on the GTEx Portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/). We found individuals carrying the AA genotype had higher APOB expression; however, it was determined that GG genotype-carriers might have lower expression of APOB (Fig. 3). The genotyping methods included polymerase chain reaction-restrictive fragment length polymorphism, sequencing, and TaqMan. Finally, we evaluated whether the rs693 polymorphism can influence APOB gene expression, and an online analysis service (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/) was applied. Results implied that individuals carrying the AA genotype might have higher APOB expression than those with the GG genotype, which suggested that the rs693 polymorphism can result in a change to the APOB protein and its functions.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart illustrating the search strategy used to identify association studies for APOB gene rs693 polymorphisms and GD risk

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies in APOB rs693 polymorphism and gallstone disease risk
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure2

The MAF of minor-allele (mutant-allele) for APOB gene rs693 polymorphism from the 1000 Genomes online database and present analysis

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

The different genotypes based on online GTEx Portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/)

Full size image

Quantitative synthesis

In the entire analysis, increased associations were observed in the three genetic models (allelic contrast: OR: 1.40, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.87, Pheterogeneity < 0.001, P = 0.023, I2 = 73.9 %; heterozygote comparison: OR: 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.13–2.21, Pheterogeneity < 0.001, P = 0.007, I2 = 67.8 %; dominant model: OR: 1.54, 95 % CI: 1.09–2.17, P < 0.001 for heterogeneity, P = 0.014, I2 = 71.1 %). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, based on different frequencies of races, there were also increased associations between this polymorphism and GD in Asians, but not in Europeans, in all models (A-allele vs. G-allele: OR: 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.27–2.95, Pheterogeneity < 0.001, P = 0.002, I2 = 73.7 %, Fig. 4 A; AG vs. GG: OR = 2.18, 95 %CI = 1.48–3.21, Pheterogeneity = 0.008, P < 0.001, I2 = 59.3.9 %, Fig. 4 C; AA + AG vs. GG: OR: 2.41, 95 % CI: 1.41–3.24, Pheterogeneity = 0.002, P < 0.001, I2 = 65.8 %, Fig. 4E). In addition, regular analysis with source of control also showed a significant trend for this SNP in HB rather than PB studies (such as A-allele vs. G-allele: OR: 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.07–2.49, Pheterogeneity < 0.001, P = 0.023, I2 = 70.0 %). Finally, different sexes had a different incidence, and we tried to analyze this relationship in the sex subgroup as to whether significant associations exist in our analysis, but unfortunately, no significant association was found both for males and females in the three models (Fig. 5 A–C; Table 2).

Fig. 4
figure4

 A-allele frequencies for the APOB gene rs693 polymorphism among cases/controls stratified by ethnicity. a A-allele vs. G-allele model; c AG vs. GG model; e AA + AG vs. GG model. Sensitivity analysis between APOB gene rs693 polymorphism and GD risk. b A-allele vs. G-allele model; d AG vs. GG model; f AA + AG vs. GG model

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

Forest plot of GD risk associated with APOB gene rs693 polymorphism by sex subgroup. a A-allele vs. G-allele model; c AG vs. GG model; e AA + AG vs. GG model

Full size image
Table 2 Results of the meta-analysis on APOB rs693 polymorphism and gallstone disease risk in total and types of subgroups
Full size table

Bias diagnosis for publication and sensitivity analysis

The publication bias was evaluated by using both Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test. At the beginning, the shape of the funnel plots seemed asymmetrical for the allele comparison of rs693 obtained using Begg’s test, suggesting that no publication bias existed. Then, Egger’s test was applied to provide statistical evidence of funnel plot symmetry. As a result, no obvious evidence of publication bias was observed (A-allele vs. G-allele: t = 2.57, P = 0.024 for Egger’s test; z = 1.75, P = 0.08 for Begg’s test; Fig. 6 A,B; Table 3). To exclude studies that might influence the power and stability of the entire study, we applied sensitivity analysis; finally, no sensitive case-control studies were found for this SNP in the three models (Fig. 4B,D,F).

Fig. 6
figure6

Begg’s funnel plot for publication bias test. a A-allele vs. G-allele model; c AG vs. GG model; e AA + AG vs. GG model. Each point represents a separate study for the indicated association. Log [OR], natural logarithm of OR. Horizontal line, mean effect size. Egger’s publication bias plot. b A-allele vs. G-allele model; d AG vs. GG model; f AA + AG vs. GG model

Full size image
Table 3 Publication bias tests (Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test for publication bias test) for APOB rs693 polymorphism
Full size table

Meta‐regression

This analysis showed only a significant relationship for the allele model (A-allele vs. G-allele) for ethnicity with a regression coefficient of 0.006, rather than for the publication year and source of control subgroups, which means that the heterogeneity of the rs693 polymorphism in AF might be from the subgroup of ethnicity (Fig. 7 A–F).

Fig. 7
figure7

Random-effect meta-regression of log odds ratio versus publication year (a), ethnicity (b), source of control (c) respectively in GD

Full size image

Gene–gene Network Diagram and interaction based on Online Website

The String online server indicated that the APOB gene interacts with numerous genes. The gene–gene interaction network has been illustrated in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
figure8

Human APOB interactions network with other genes obtained from String server. At least 10 genes have been indicated to correlate with APOB gene. APOA1: apolipoprotein A-I; APOA2: apolipoprotein A-II; MTTP: microsomal triglyceride transfer protein large subunit; LDLR: low-density lipoprotein receptor; APOC3: apolipoprotein C-III; APOE: apolipoprotein E; LPA: apolipoprotein (a); PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilish/kexin type 9; CETP: cholesteryl ester transfer protein; APOA4: apolipoprotein A-IV

Full size image

Discussion

GD is the most common disorder of the biliary system worldwide. The disease is generally non-life-threatening; however, the quality of life for patients is affected by upper right abdominal pain with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting, and feelings of fullness after meals [40]. The incidence of GD has increased rapidly by nearly 2-fold every 10 years based on diet changes, widespread type-B ultrasound application, the concept of physical examinations, and other factors. Hence, further exploration of potential risk factors (besides common factors, such as pregnancy, obesity, metabolic syndrome, bariatric surgery, and ileal resection [41]) of GD should be conducted. Gu et al. carried out an observational study, suggesting that alanine transaminase activity, total standard bicarbonate, TG, and low density lipoprotein levels might be associated with the risk of GD [42].

To date, multiple genes have been shown to be associated with increased GD risk, such as ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 8, mucin-like protocadherin, and apolipoprotein E [43,44,45]. In addition, more and more studies have indicated that the APOB rs693 polymorphism might be associated with GD risk. Due to the limited number of samples used for each study, the conclusion for every study might not be credible. Dixit et al. included 214 patients with GD and 322 healthy controls and suggested that the rs693 polymorphism might not be related to GD risk[16]. In addition, Baez et al. enrolled 110 patients with GD and 70 healthy controls and showed that the rs693 variant is involved in gallstone formation and GD risk[15]. It is necessary to combine all previous studies and increase the sample size, and our aim was to obtain a comprehensive and convincing conclusion about the association between the rs693 polymorphism and GD susceptibility.

Thus, it was necessary to analyze the association between the rs693 polymorphism and GD risk using a meta-analysis method. After searching through the main database, 14 different case-control studies were identified, including 1583 cases of GD and 1794 controls. The main result of the current study is that the rs693 polymorphism is a risk factor for GD for all patients, especially in the Asian population (Chinese), which might offer a reference for early detection, prevention, and treatment. Because the incidence for GD between males and females is different, we tried to analyze whether the rs693 polymorphism differed between the two sexes; however, the analysis did not produce any positive results, which might be due to the samples.

We found publication bias in the A-allele vs. G-allele model, which might affect the strength and credibility of our conclusion. Here, we have discussed some possible reasons for this. According to the composition of the GD, it can be categorized as follows: cholesterol stones, pigment stones, and mixed stones, of which cholesterol stones are the most common; and based on the site of occurrence, GD can be divided into extrahepatic bile duct stones and hepatolithiasis, of which gallstones account for approximately 50 % of all stones. In the studies included presently, only one study indicated cholesterol stone; meta-regression was applied and showed heterogeneity. Moreover, publication bias might originate from ethnicity, because most studies were from Asian populations, especially from China, and only two studies were from Europe.

It is well known that the development of GD is complex and multi-factorial. Focusing on only one gene or one polymorphism might create a bias. Thus, we attempted to detect some related genes associated with APOB based on the online String server. The 10 most probable genes are shown in the network around the APOB gene. Among them, six are of the apolipoprotein family (subtypes), and the first related genes are APOA1 and APOA2. Dixit et al. confirmed that the APOA1 75G/A polymorphism is associated with GD and showed sex-specific differences. However, the APOC3 Sstl polymorphism was not found to be a factor for GD susceptibility [46]. Sarac et al. reported that increased leptin levels are associated with high LPA and APOB levels; however, in contrast, decreased APOA1 levels are found in patients with cholelithiasis [47]. Li et al. conducted meta-analyses and found insufficient evidence of an association between the APOE E4 polymorphism and GD risk [45]. Castro et al. suggested increased hepatic MTTP activity and bile acid synthesis in patients with GD [48]. Stender et al. found that a PCSK9 genetic variant is associated with LDL-C level and influences the formation of GD [49]. In summary, we should thoroughly explore these partners of the APOB gene, as well as gene–gene interactions, in the development of GD in future studies. In addition, we tried to review the variants that are in linkage with the rs693 variant and identify probable exonic and functional variants as rs693 is a synonymous variant. Just only one paper reported by Xiao et al. was found about ischemic stroke not GD disease. They found that two blocks in APOB constructed by Block 1 (rs1042034, rs676210, rs693, rs673548) and Block 2 (rs3791981, rs679899) in chromosome 2 with linkage disequilibrium [50].

There are some other limitations that should be addressed as well. First, further studies should focus on mixed and African populations, which were not represented in the current analysis. Second, because GD is a multi-factorial disease, gene–gene and gene–environment interactions should be considered and assessed. It is possible that specific environmental and lifestyle factors influence the associations between the APOB rs693 polymorphism and GD, including age, sex, diet, diabetes, smoking, familial history, surgical history, and hypertension. Third, whether patients with GD have other complications, such as liver dysfunction, dyslipidemia, and a history of GI obstruction was not reported in the included studies. Further comprehensive studies should include such information. Fourth, the type of stone composition was not distinguished, which should be analyzed separately and can result in more accurate assessments for prediction and treatment.

Conclusions

Our present meta-analysis suggests that the APOB rs693 polymorphism might be a powerful predictor of GD risk, which can serve as a detection method in clinics to provide early identification and caution patients with GD.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

GD:

Gallbladder disease

APOB:

Apolipoprotein B

HWE:

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

OR:

Odds ratio

95%CI:

95% Confidence interval

References

  1. 1.

    Di Ciaula A, Wang DQ, Portincasa P. Cholesterol cholelithiasis: part of a systemic metabolic disease, prone to primary prevention. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;13(2):157–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Figueiredo JC, Haiman C, Porcel J, Buxbaum J, Stram D, Tambe N, Cozen W, Wilkens L, Le Marchand L, Setiawan VW. Sex and ethnic/racial-specific risk factors for gallbladder disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17(1):153.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012;6(2):172–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Littlefield A, Lenahan C. Cholelithiasis: presentation and management. J Midwifery Women Health. 2019;64(3):289–97.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease.&nbsp;Best practice research . Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):981–96.

  6. 6.

    Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Gallstones. BMJ. 2014;348:g2669.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gutt C, Schläfer S, Lammert F. The treatment of gallstone disease. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 2020;117(9):148–58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feingold KR, Grunfeld C, et al. Introduction to Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Hofland HJ, Kaltsas G, et al., editors. Endotext. Dartmouth: MDText.com, Inc.Copyright© 2000-2020, MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.

  9. 9.

    Yang CY, Gu ZW, Weng SA, Kim TW, Chen SH, Pownall HJ, Sharp PM, Liu SW, Li WH, Gotto AM Jr, et al. Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 of human low density lipoproteins. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas Tex). 1989;9(1):96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Benn M, Nordestgaard BG, Jensen JS, Grande P, Sillesen H, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Polymorphism in APOB associated with increased low-density lipoprotein levels in both genders in the general population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(10):5797–803.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Han T, Jiang Z, Suo G, Zhang S. Apolipoprotein B-100 gene Xba I polymorphism and cholesterol gallstone disease. Clin Genet. 2000;57(4):304–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rauscher R, Ignatova Z. Timing during translation matters: synonymous mutations in human pathologies influence protein folding and function. Biochem Soc Transact. 2018;46(4):937–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zheng S, Kim H, Verhaak RGW. Silent mutations make some noise. Cell. 2014;156(6):1129–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Supek F, Miñana B, Valcárcel J, Gabaldón T, Lehner B. Synonymous mutations frequently act as driver mutations in human cancers. Cell. 2014;156(6):1324–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Báez S, Tsuchiya Y, Calvo A, Pruyas M, Nakamura K, Kiyohara C, Oyama M, Yamamoto M. Genetic variants involved in gallstone formation and capsaicin metabolism, and the risk of gallbladder cancer in Chilean women. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(3):372–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dixit M, Srivastava A, Choudhuri G, Mittal B. Higher alleles of apolipoprotein B gene 3’ VNTR: Risk for gallstone disease. Indian J Clin Biochem: IJCB. 2008;23(2):123–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Juvonen T, Savolainen MJ, Kairaluoma MI, Lajunen LH, Humphries SE, Kesäniemi YA. Polymorphisms at the apoB, apoA-I, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene loci in patients with gallbladder disease. J Lipid Res. 1995;36(4):804–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kurzawski M, Juzyszyn Z, Modrzejewski A, Pawlik A, Wiatr M, Czerny B, Adamcewicz R, Droździk M. Apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene polymorphism in patients with gallbladder disease. Arch Med Res. 2007;38(3):360–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rudzińska K, Bogacz A, Kotrych D, Wolski H, Majchrzycki M, Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A, Kosiński B, Czerny B. The APOB gene polymorphism in the pathogenesis of gallstone disease in pre- and postmenopausal women. Przeglad Menopauzalny = Menopause Rev. 2015;14(1):35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sánchez-Cuén J, Aguilar-Medina M, Arámbula-Meraz E, Romero-Navarro J, Granados J, Sicairos-Medina L, Ramos-Payán R. ApoB-100, ApoE and CYP7A1 gene polymorphisms in Mexican patients with cholesterol gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(37):4685–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gu JP, Huang GY, Jiang ZH, Cai Q, Xu ZP, Ding JB, Xiao LJ, Cao YO, Shang J, Cai XX, et al. Relationship between apolipoprotein B gene Xba I polymorphism and gallbladder stone disease. Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg. 2008;12(1):34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ji J, Liu Y, Yu Y, Shi JS. Relationshio between apolipoprotein B gene Xba I and EcoR I polymorphisms and cholelithiasis. Chin J Dig Surg. 2014;13(4):291–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jiang ZY, Han TQ, Suo GJ, Chen S, Zhu QM, He XW, Shen SQ, Gu JP, Huang GY, Jiang ZH, et al. Study on the Apo B gene Xba I polymorphism in patients with gallbladder stones and its relation with serum lipids. J Surg Concepts Pract. 1999;4(1):18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Suo GJ, Han TQ, Feng DX, Jiang ZH, Zhang SD. Association of polymorphisms of apolipoprotein B gene with cholesterol gallstone disease. Natl Med J China. 1999;79(9):673–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tan YF, Yang S, Yu RB, Shen C, Ding WL, Zhou WM, Gong WD, Yao CL. Relationship among the Xba I and EcoR I locus polymorphisms of apolipoprotein B gene, serum lipid metabolism and gallstone disease. Natl Med J China. 2003;83(10):844–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wei JB, Lin QY, Cheng NS, Zhang MY, Xiao LJ. Relationship between apolipoprotein B gene polymorphism and gallstone disease. Chin J Med Gentet. 2001;18(1):66–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang X, Yan H, Liu SH. Study on the relationship between apolipoproten B gene polymorphism, blood lipid composition and gallstone. Xinjiang Med. 2009;39:39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yu J, Lin QY: Relationship among the Xba I locus polymorphisms of apolipoprotein B gene, serum lipid metabolism and gallstone disease. SiChuan University (Master’s dissertation). 2005.

  29. 29.

    Niu C, Luo Z, Yu L, Yang Y, Chen Y, Luo X, Lai F, Song Y. Associations of the APOB rs693 and rs17240441 polymorphisms with plasma APOB and lipid levels: a meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1):166.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Ma XY, Cai JP, Li Y, Lu GC, Wei RL: Myocilin polymorphisms and primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one.2012;7(9):e46632.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zeng T, Guo FF, Zhang CL, Song FY, Zhao XL, Xie KQ: Roles of cytochrome P4502E1 gene polymorphisms and the risks of alcoholic liver disease: a meta-analysis. PloS one 2013;8(1):e54188.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Contr Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mohammadi A, Azarnezhad A, Khanbabaei H, Izadpanah E, Abdollahzadeh R, Barreto GE, Sahebkar A. Vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Steroids. 2020;158:108615.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Napolioni V. The relevance of checking population allele frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in genetic association studies: the case of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in a Chinese Han irritable bowel syndrome association study. Immunol Lett . 2014;162(1 Pt A):276–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hayashino Y, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias. J Epidemiol. 2005;15(6):235–43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shao HB, Ren K, Gao SL, Zou JG, Mi YY, Zhang LF, Zuo L, Okada A, Yasui T. Human methionine synthase A2756G polymorphism increases susceptibility to prostate cancer. Aging. 2018;10(7):1776–88.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Moseley RH. Liver and biliary tract disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2006;22(3):193–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jones MW, Weir CB, Ghassemzadeh S. Gallstones (Cholelithiasis). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing.Copyright © 2020, StatPearls Publishing LLC.2020.

  42. 42.

    Gu Q, Zhou G, Xu T. Risk factors for gallstone disease in Shanghai: An observational study. Medicine. 2020;99(3):e18754.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chuang SC, Hsi E, Wang SN, Yu ML, Lee KT, Juo SH. Polymorphism at the mucin-like protocadherin gene influences susceptibility to gallstone disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(23–24):2089–93.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Katsika D, Magnusson P, Krawczyk M, Grünhage F, Lichtenstein P, Einarsson C, Lammert F, Marschall HU. Gallstone disease in Swedish twins: risk is associated with ABCG8 D19H genotype. J Intern Med. 2010;268(3):279–85.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Li L, Qiao X, Wang X, Liu D, Xue Q, Han L, Dai F, Ma G, Yang Z, Zhang T, et al: The association between apolipoprotein E and gallstone disease: an updated meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet.2019;20(1):109.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dixit M, Choudhuri G, Saxena R, Mittal B. Association of apolipoprotein A1-C3 gene cluster polymorphisms with gallstone disease. Can J Gastroenterol= J Canadien de Gastroenterologie. 2007;21(9):569–75.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Saraç S, Atamer A, Atamer Y, Can AS, Bilici A, Taçyildiz İ, Koçyiğit Y, Yenice N. Leptin levels and lipoprotein profiles in patients with cholelithiasis. J Int Med Res. 2015;43(3):385–92.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Castro J, Amigo L, Miquel JF, Gälman C, Crovari F, Raddatz A, Zanlungo S, Jalil R, Rudling M, Nervi F. Increased activity of hepatic microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and bile acid synthesis in gallstone disease. Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1261–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Stender S, Frikke-Schmidt R, Benn M, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of gallstone disease: a Mendelian randomization study and meta-analyses. J Hepatol. 2013;58(1):126–33.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Xiao R, Sun S, Zhang J, Ouyang Y, Zhang N, Yang M, Jin T, Xia Y. Association analysis of APO gene polymorphisms with ischemic stroke risk: a case-control study in a Chinese Han population. Oncotarget. 2017;8(36):60496–503.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Fangta Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Songjiang District, 201600, Shanghai, China

    Haifeng Zhu, Linhai Yu & Linsong Feng

Authors
  1. Haifeng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linhai Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linsong Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HZ conceived and designed this study. LY searched for literature and collected the data. LY analyzed the data. LF wrote the paper. LF revised the whole paper. LF contributed to the analysis tools and performed the statistical analysis. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linsong Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors proclaim that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Yu, L. & Feng, L. Association of apolipoprotein B XbaI (rs693) polymorphism and gallstone disease risk based on a comprehensive analysis. Genes and Environ 43, 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-021-00189-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Apolipoprotein B
  • Gallstone disease
  • Polymorphism
  • Meta‐analysis
  • Risk

Genes and Environment

ISSN: 1880-7062

Contact us