Skip to main content

Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia risk: a comprehensive review and network-based toxicogenomic approach

Abstract

Formaldehyde is a widely used but highly reactive and toxic chemical. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies formaldehyde as a Group 1 carcinogen, based on nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia studies. However, the correlation between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia incidence is a controversial issue. To understand the association between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia, we explored biological networks based on formaldehyde-related genes retrieved from public and commercial databases. Through the literature-based network approach, we summarized qualitative associations between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia. Our results indicate that oxidative stress-mediated genetic changes induced by formaldehyde could disturb the hematopoietic system, possibly leading to leukemia. Furthermore, we suggested major genes that are thought to be affected by formaldehyde exposure and associated with leukemia development. Our suggestions can be used to complement experimental data for understanding and identifying the leukemogenic mechanism of formaldehyde.

Background

Formaldehyde is a colorless, pungent-smelling, and highly reactive chemical with toxic properties. As the simplest aldehyde form (H-CHO), formaldehyde is synthesized by the catalytic oxidation of methanol. It is also easily dissolved in water; a 37% formaldehyde solution is used as a preservative, pesticide, and disinfectant. Formaldehyde is manufactured commercially and used extensively in many products, such as resins, plastics, textiles, wood products, adhesives, medicines, and cosmetics [1]. The predominant route of formaldehyde exposure is inhalation occurring during environmental and occupational exposure [2]. Environmental exposure to formaldehyde occurs more frequently indoors than outdoors due to the widespread use of products containing formaldehyde [3]. The World Health Organization recommends an indoor limit of formaldehyde of 0.1 mg/m3 (0.08 ppm) [4]. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde is variable and occurs in numerous industries, including manufacturing [5]. Small amounts of formaldehyde are naturally generated in living organisms through normal metabolic processes, such as DNA/RNA/histone demethylation and oxidative deamination [6]. The concentration of endogenous formaldehyde in the blood of humans is approximately 2–3 mg/L (0.1 mM) [7]. Therefore, many people are constantly exposed to formaldehyde, in large or small quantities, in their daily lives because of its ubiquitous nature.

Exogenous formaldehyde exposure is commonly associated with eye and upper respiratory tract irritation. Formaldehyde is genotoxic and cytotoxic, inducing DNA damage and chromosomal changes [8]. Increased genomic instability from genotoxic chemicals can increase the risk of cancer [9,10,11,12]. Formaldehyde is classified as a human carcinogen (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), based on studies of nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia [13]. However, studies on the causal relationship between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia development are controversial, with conflicting results [14].

Advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have led to the development of disciplines that focus on the organization and analysis of large-scale biological data [15, 16]. Toxicogenomics (a combination of toxicology and genomics) is a field that studies genomic responses to xenobiotic exposures [17, 18]. Toxicogenomics provides information on the effects of toxicant exposure on humans, ranging from genetic alterations to disease, based on a genetic profile, with the goal of identifying biomarkers and toxicity mechanisms using high-throughput technologies [19,20,21]. Many public resources on chemical–gene–disease interactions and other toxicogenomic information can be easily accessed [22]. The macroscopic integration of existing knowledge can result from big data utilization, leading to new perspectives on intricate biological interactions. In this review, we discuss the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in relation to leukemia through a toxicogenomic approach. Using public and commercial databases, we explore biological networks to better understand the association between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia development.

Review

Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde

In the early 1980s, findings from studies on nasal tumors in rats exposed to formaldehyde provoked concern about its carcinogenicity [23,24,25]. Diverse chronic and sub-chronic rodent studies provided sufficient evidence that inhalation and oral administration routes of formaldehyde exposure induce cancer [13]. Furthermore, concentration-dependent increases of formaldehyde on tumor incidence and cell proliferation were demonstrated [26, 27]. The association between formaldehyde and the development of cancers was also reported in many epidemiological studies [13]. At the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Hauptmann et al. conducted the largest epidemiological study on occupational exposure to formaldehyde and found a statistically significant increase in death from nasopharyngeal cancer [28]. Based on the comprehensive results of large-scale human and animal studies, the IARC concluded that formaldehyde causes nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia and is positively associated with sinonasal cancer [13].

Formaldehyde can react with DNA, and in the majority of studies, it displays genotoxicity during mutation tests in vitro and in vivo [29]. Increased DNA damage, micronucleus formation, sister chromatid exchanges, and chromosome aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes and nasal mucosa were observed during human occupational studies on formaldehyde exposure [30,31,32]. Significant changes in the percentage of B cells, cytotoxic T cells, and natural killer cells were found, and genetic polymorphisms in metabolic and DNA repair genes were associated with increased genetic damages in subjects exposed to formaldehyde [33,34,35]. Exogenous and endogenous formaldehyde can induce N2-hydroxymethyl-dG adducts [36]. In vitro studies showed induction of DNA–protein crosslinks (DPCs) by formaldehyde exposure in white blood and nasal epithelial cells [37, 38]. In addition, DPCs in white blood cells were higher in workers exposed to formaldehyde than in non-exposed workers [37, 39]. As the early lesions in the process of carcinogenesis, the level of DPCs is considered a biomarker of formaldehyde exposure [37, 39]. These genotoxic effects are the potential carcinogenic mode of action for formaldehyde [5, 27].

Association between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia incidence

Although the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde as a consequence of chronic exposure has been indicated [13], the biological mechanisms by which formaldehyde induces cancer are not completely understood. The association between formaldehyde exposure and the occurrence of leukemia is especially disputable. After examining the data from various epidemiological and animal studies, the IARC concluded that there is “strong but not sufficient evidence” that formaldehyde causes leukemia [13]. Three large industrial cohort studies [40,41,42] notably influenced the interpretation of other studies on formaldehyde exposure and leukemia, and positive associations were observed in the two cohort studies [41, 42]. Coggon et al. investigated a cohort of 14,014 workers at six British factories where formaldehyde was produced or used, and they observed no association [40]. Hauptmann et al. retrospectively analyzed the data from a study undertaken by the NCI that included 25,619 workers at 10 U.S. industrial plants that used or produced formaldehyde [41]. Pinkerton et al. conducted a study for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health that included 11,039 workers in three garment plants where formaldehyde resins were used in fabric processing [42]. These three original studies and their updated versions are summarized in Table 1 [40,41,42,43,44,45]. A review of the recent study findings that included an extended follow-up period after 10 years or more showed that the risk of leukemia tended to decrease. Some case-control studies evaluated the risk of lymphohematopoietic malignancies, but no significant elevations of leukemia risk were found [46,47,48,49]. Among these studies, Linos et al. showed a significantly elevated risk for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among employees in funeral homes and crematories when age and state of residence were adjusted (three exposed cases, odds ratio = 6.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.2–36.2) [47]. Hauptmann et al. also reported a significantly increased risk for myeloid leukemia among funeral industry workers who performed embalming for more than 34 years compared to subjects who performed embalming less than 500 times (14 exposed cases, odds ratio = 3.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.2–12.5, p = 0.024) [50]. Other epidemiological studies, meta-analyses, and re-evaluations of previous studies showed inconsistent findings on the association between formaldehyde and leukemia [2, 8, 13, 51,52,53].

Table 1 Summary of large cohort studies about formaldehyde and leukemia

There is debate on the biological plausibility of whether formaldehyde can induce distant-site toxicity, as formaldehyde is rapidly metabolized and highly reactive, and its toxicity is generally limited to the local exposure site [5, 54]. Therefore, it would be valuable to demonstrate the formaldehyde-induced leukemogenic traits, such as 1) exogenous formaldehyde can reach the bone marrow, 2) formaldehyde can induce hematopoietic toxicity, and 3) leukemia occurs in animal models exposed to formaldehyde [29]. Zhang et al. suggested three potential mechanisms for formaldehyde-induced leukemia: direct damage to stem cells in the bone marrow through the blood, damage to hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells circulating in the blood, and damage to primitive pluripotent stem cells present within nasal or oral passages [8]. Considering that formaldehyde and its metabolic pathway exist naturally in all cells, it is likely that formaldehyde toxicity occurs as a result of high concentration exposure that overwhelms normal metabolic capacities [29]. As a basis for the occurrence of distant-site toxicity, several studies were undertaken to estimate increased formaldehyde concentrations in the blood due to formaldehyde exposure. Significant effects of formaldehyde exposure were not observed in the blood of humans exposed to 1.9 ppm for 40 min, rats exposed to 14.4 ppm for 2 h [7], or in rhesus monkeys exposed to 6 ppm for 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks [55]. The failure of exogenous formaldehyde to increase formaldehyde levels in the blood decreases the likelihood that formaldehyde directly affects the bone marrow. Other studies used radiolabeled formaldehyde to examine its systemic toxicity in distant sites. Rats exposed to up to 15 ppm of 14C- and 3H-formaldehyde for 6 h did not show an increase in covalent adducts in the bone marrow [56]. Rats lacking glutathione, required for formaldehyde oxidation, also did not show an increase in covalent adducts in bone marrow following formaldehyde inhalation [57]. In rats and non-human primates, exogenous DNA adducts formed by inhaled 13CD2-formaldehyde were found only in the nasal epithelium and not in the bone marrow and peripheral blood cells (rats: 10 ppm, 1 or 5 days; 2 ppm, 7–28 days; 15 ppm, 1–4 days; monkeys: 6 ppm, 2 days) [36, 58,59,60]. These studies concluded that exogenous formaldehyde does not cause distant-site toxicity beyond the portal of entry. Although the exposure periods tend to be short, these results show that Zhang et al.’s hypothesized modes of action of formaldehyde-induced leukemia might be unlikely [14].

In contrast, some animal studies reported an increased incidence of hematological malignancies or toxicity in bone marrow following formaldehyde exposure. The incidence of lymphoma in mice exposed to 14.3 ppm for 2 years was slightly increased (p = 0.06), and survival-adjusted undifferentiated leukemia in rats was increased (p < 0.0167) [24]. Hematopoietic tumors in high-dose oral-exposed rats [61] and clastogenic and cytogenetic effects on the bone marrow in rats exposed to low concentrations of formaldehyde (0.5 or 1.5 mg/m3) were observed [62]. However, there were questions regarding the data reliability of these studies, and other studies contradicted the results [29, 54]. Recent animal studies designed to simulate human occupational exposures reported bone marrow toxicities induced by formaldehyde, suggesting potential toxic mechanisms via oxidative stress. Mice exposed to up to 3 mg/m3 formaldehyde (8 h/day for 7 days) by nose-only inhalation exhibited a significant dose-dependent increase in reactive oxygen species and DPCs and a decrease of glutathione in distant organs, including bone marrow [63]. Under a similar exposure condition for 2 weeks, there was a significant decrease in the counts of leucocytes, erythrocytes, and lymphocytes and bone marrow toxicity induced via oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis [64, 65]. Furthermore, whole-body inhalation of 3 mg/m3 in mice decreased nucleated bone marrow cells and colony formation from bone marrow stem/progenitor cells, increasing oxidative stress [66, 67]. In mice exposed to formaldehyde (20, 40, and 80 mg/m3) for 15 days (2 h/day), bone marrow toxicities (pathological changes, decreased activity of antioxidants, increased micronucleus, DNA damage, and malondialdehyde) and expression changes in Prx, Mpo, Bax, Bcl-2, and Cycs protein were observed [68, 69]. Deficiencies of the genes Aldh2, Adh5, and Fancd2, which detoxify endogenous formaldehyde, led to hematotoxicity and leukemia in mice [70, 71]. Interestingly, studies showing bone marrow toxicity caused by formaldehyde were mainly conducted in mice, an important consideration in light of the interspecies differences in exposure effects [72]. Based on these results, indirect or unknown effects of formaldehyde may cause toxicity at the distant site, including bone marrow. Alterations in the genes related to leukemia development caused by formaldehyde exposure would be key events in converting a hematopoietic stem cell into a leukemic stem cell and subsequent disease development [8, 73].

Inconsistency of results from numerous studies about formaldehyde exposure and leukemia demonstrates the need to consider the effects of individual genetic backgrounds, interspecies differences, and exposure concentration and duration, as the expression of a phenotype can differ between individuals equally exposed to a toxicant [74,75,76,77]. In this regard, to help better understand this complexity, we applied a novel approach that utilizes genomic data in order to summarize the association between formaldehyde and leukemia. In the summarizing process, we additionally suggest specific genes as potential biomarker candidates with strong links to formaldehyde exposure and leukemia development.

Formaldehyde-related genomic resources

With the development of bioinformatics, approaches that utilize existing data to elucidate biological phenomena are widely used. Biological databases manage diverse data types, such as DNA, RNA, proteins, diseases, pathways, and literature studies [78]. The active use of databases can provide new perspectives on human-related studies, such as biomarker identification, prediction of human health effects, early diagnosis of disease, and drug development [79, 80]. To explore the association between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia through molecular network analysis, we searched formaldehyde-related genes from public and commercial databases.

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) is a publicly available database that provides information about the human health effects of chemicals (http://ctdbase.org/). Its core contents include various chemical–gene–disease interactions manually curated from the literature [22]. These data are not only internally integrated with each other but also with external datasets in order to expand networks and predict novel inferences. Pathway Studio (version 12.3; Elsevier, Netherlands) is a commercially available text mining-based biological network analysis software that enables researchers to explore molecular interactions of diverse biological processes and visualize this information by integrating knowledge from millions of scientific publications [81]. Through the keyword search in CTD and the Pathway Studio database, we retrieved 3927 and 416 formaldehyde-related genes, respectively (accessed 1 Oct 2020). We then identified 122 common genes affected by exogenous formaldehyde exposure in both databases through the examination of the original papers (Supplementary materials).

Possibility of oxidative stress-mediated leukemia development

Network-based approaches are widely used to elucidate dynamic biological interactions [82, 83]. The greatest advantage of molecular network analysis is that it can be used to determine interactions among multiple factors that affect a correlation, based on a vast scientific literature, instead of focusing on one-dimensional relationships among a small number of factors. To infer the association between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia incidence, we explored key molecular networks for the 122 common genes using the Pathway Studio software. Pathway Studio presents biological relations through the connectivity (edge) among the entities (nodes), such as genes, cell processes, diseases, or chemicals. The relation is determined using reference sentences extracted from the scientific literature and the number of references [81]. Therefore, our network approach sums up the existing knowledge known between formaldehyde and leukemia.

The biological interactions of the 122 genes associated with hematological malignancies and cell processes were initially predicted (Fig. 1, Supplementary materials). For the minimal academic credibility, only relations confirmed by more than three references were considered. Subsequently, the criteria of the number of references were adjusted, considering the total connectivity on each entity (i.e., the total amount of relations) in the Pathway Studio database (1 reference per 1000 connectivity) to reduce the bias of analysis from interactions that have been more intensively studied. We selected formaldehyde-related hematological malignancies by referring to epidemiological data in the IARC report published in 2012 [13]. The relation types of “Quantitative Change,” “Genetic Change,” and “Regulation” between genes and diseases were analyzed (Fig. 1a). These genes were associated with many subtypes of leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma (AML, chronic myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, etc.). Figure 1b shows that these genes regulate the cell processes associated with the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of formaldehyde. Our prediction suggests that exposure to formaldehyde increases the generation of reactive oxygen species and induces oxidative stress and DNA damage, resulting in cytotoxicity and an increased cancer risk caused by abnormal cell proliferation and differentiation. Additionally, a detailed review summarized in Fig. 2 was conducted by screening major genes, cell processes, and leukemic diseases with many interactions in the network to determine their influence on the hematopoietic system. We carefully examined the reliability of references regarding the correlation between formaldehyde exposure and other entities to distinguish any inaccurate reference information that the text mining technique could have produced; for example, are the associations negative or positive simply based on the number of references? Do the studies come primarily from one research group? However, our current analysis could not distinguish conflicting interests among research groups. As a result of this detailed literature-based prediction, we hypothesize that formaldehyde can induce the development of leukemia by disturbing the normal differentiation process of hematopoietic stem cells through the induction of dysfunctions in major genes via oxidative stress. Furthermore, it is predicted that formaldehyde could interfere with the function of antioxidant enzymes in the bone marrow and lymphocytes. Alterations of genes GSTT1 and GSTP1 that inhibit oxidative stress [84] were associated with leukemia, especially AML. The expression changes in these genes were also identified in the bone marrow of mice that inhaled formaldehyde and rats’ white blood cells, respectively [64, 85]. Abnormal lymphocytes are a major feature of lymphohematopoietic malignancies [86, 87]. To support the reliability of the networks, we categorized the top diseases and biological functions of selected genes in Fig. 1 using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Qiagen, Germany), a popular bioinformatics analysis software (Supplementary Table 1). Selected formaldehyde-related genes were associated with cancer and hematological system development and function. Especially, we suggest major genes that are worth considering when attempting to identify the links between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia (Table 2). Several studies reported that formaldehyde induces expression changes in TP53 and BCL2, responsible for regulating apoptotic mechanisms [88,89,90]. Abnormal apoptosis due to formaldehyde exposure may lead to unregulated self-renewal of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells [66, 91]. The BAX/BCL2 ratio has clinical significance in leukemias [92]. Furthermore, DNMT3A, which is regulated by TP53, is frequently mutated in AML and other hematological malignancies [93], and a decrease in DNMT3A expression by formaldehyde exposure suggested that formaldehyde has hypomethylation effects [94, 95]. In various leukemic disease studies, TNF expression was increased and associated with poor prognosis [96,97,98]. Therefore, identifying the changes in major genes in the hematopoietic system caused by prolonged exposure to formaldehyde will be valuable in understanding the leukemogenic mechanism.

Fig. 1
figure1

Biological interactions among the formaldehyde-related genes, a hematological malignancies, and b cell processes. The molecular network analysis was conducted using Pathway Studio software (version 12.3). The relations between genes/proteins and other entities (disease and cell process) were analyzed. The schematic legend is located to the left

Fig. 2
figure2

The summarized network of the potential leukemogenic mechanism via oxidative stress. The interactions between selected entities with many associations in previous network analyses and leukemia-related entities were analyzed

Table 2 Formaldehyde and leukemia related major gene descriptions

Utilizing a literature-based network approach, we explored qualitative associations between formaldehyde and comprehensive leukemia. It was also predicted that altered gene expression or mutation triggered by oxidative stress because of formaldehyde exposure could disturb the hematopoietic system and lead to an increased risk of malignant hematopoietic diseases. Given that the biological plausibility of distant-site toxicity by formaldehyde inhalation is a key point in elucidating the possibility of leukemogenesis [14], we also examined our toxicogenomic data for genes/proteins that showed activity changes at distant sites following formaldehyde inhalation. Low concentrations of inhaled formaldehyde increased PDGFRA and MDM2 gene expressions in human peripheral lymphocytes of the residents of new apartments [99]. It was also shown that TXN gene expression decreased in human blood for subjects under controlled conditions [100]. Gene expression changes in Gpx3, Gstp1, Odc1, Polr2a, Ptgs1, and Rps6ka5 were identified in white blood cells of rats exposed to 2 ppm formaldehyde [85]. In addition, we identified gene expression changes (Atm, Epo, Cyp1a1, and Gstt1) and protein expression changes (Csf2ra, Epo, Epor, Bax, Bcl2, Mpo, and Prx2) in the bone marrow of mice that inhaled formaldehyde [64, 66,67,68,69]. The cytokine levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were increased in the bone marrow of formaldehyde-exposed mice [64]. The polymorphisms in GSTP1 and PARP1 genes were related to increased genetic damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of formaldehyde-exposed subjects [34]. Although not all genes in our toxicogenomic data reflect distant-site toxicity, some genes associated with leukemic diseases showed altered expression at distant sites following formaldehyde exposure. Based on these findings, indirect or unknown leukemia-inducing mechanisms caused by formaldehyde on the hematopoietic system cannot be ruled out.

Conclusions

In this review, we explored the controversial association between exposure to the carcinogen formaldehyde and the incidence of leukemia. Although there are inconsistent results on this topic, recent studies reported the bone marrow or hematopoietic toxicity by formaldehyde [65,66,67]. We analyzed biological networks among formaldehyde-related genes retrieved from public and commercial databases to help understand the association between formaldehyde and leukemia. Our literature-based prediction suggests a potential leukemia-inducing mechanism of formaldehyde via oxidative stress, as well as major genes associated with formaldehyde and leukemia. Validation of these genes should be performed in further studies. To better understand the leukemogenicity of formaldehyde, reproducible experiments that determine the causality are needed. Important factors, such as individual genetic backgrounds, interspecies differences, and exposure degree, should be considered. Further studies that correctly evaluate the distant-site toxicity utilizing well-designed genomic data to simulate prolonged occupational exposure will also be needed. Nevertheless, the possibility of other perspectives, such as aberrant activation of major genes and signaling pathways, is also worth considering. Our approach can be used to complement experimental data for elucidating the effects of genetic factors and can be applied in the identification of new mechanisms and biomarkers.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

CI:

Confidence interval

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CML:

Chronic myeloid leukemia

CTD:

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database

GPx:

Glutathione peroxidase

IARC:

International Agency for Research on Cancer

IPA:

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

OR:

Odds ratio

RR:

Relative risk

SMR:

Standardized mortality ratio

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TWA:

Time-weighted average

References

  1. 1.

    Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp111.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2020.

  2. 2.

    Checkoway H, Boffetta P, Mundt DJ, Mundt KA. Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(11):1747–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-0055-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kim KH, Jahan SA, Lee JT. Exposure to formaldehyde and its potential human health hazards. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2011;29:277–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected pollutants. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2010. p. 103–56. ISBN 9789289002134

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    National Toxicology Program. Final report on carcinogens background document for formaldehyde. Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010;10:i–512.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reingruber H, Pontel LB. Formaldehyde metabolism and its impact on human health. Curr Opinion Toxicol. 2018;9:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2018.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Heck HD, Casanova-Schmitz M, Dodd PB, Schachter EN, Witek TJ, Tosun T. Formaldehyde (CH2O) concentrations in the blood of humans and Fischer-344 rats exposed to CH2O under controlled conditions. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985;46(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668591394275.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang L, Steinmaus C, Eastmond DA, Xin XK, Smith MT. Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: a new meta-analysis and potential mechanisms. Mutat Res. 2009;681(2-3):150–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.07.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miller EC, Miller JA. Mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis. Cancer. 1981;47(S5):1055–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19810301)47:5+<1055:AID-CNCR2820471302>3.0.CO;2-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oliveira PA, Colaco A, Chaves R, Guedes-Pinto H, De-La-Cruz PL, Lopes C. Chemical carcinogenesis. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2007;79(4):593–616. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652007000400004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cohen SM, Arnold LL. Chemical Carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci. 2010;120:S76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kang DS, Yang JH, Kim HS, Koo BK, Lee CM, Ahn YS, et al. Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to risk assessment for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals. J Cancer Prev. 2018;23(3):126–33. https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2018.23.3.126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    International Agency for Research on Cancer. Chemical agents and related occupations. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100:9–562.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Andersen ME, Gentry PR, Swenberg JA, Mundt KA, White KW, Thompson C, et al. Considerations for refining the risk assessment process for formaldehyde: results from an interdisciplinary workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;106:210–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rim KT. Adverse outcome pathways for chemical toxicity and their applications to workers’ health: a literature review. Toxicol Environ Health Sci. 2020;12(2):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-020-00053-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rim KT. In silico prediction of toxicity and its applications for chemicals at work. Toxicol Environ Health Sci. 2020;12(3):191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-020-00056-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Koedrith P, Kim H, Weon JI, Seo YR. Toxicogenomic approaches for understanding molecular mechanisms of heavy metal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013;216(5):587–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.02.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rim K-T, Kim S-J. A toxicogenomics study of two chemicals in coffee roasting process. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2020;16(1):25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-019-00055-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ancizar-Aristizábal F, Castiblanco-Rodríguez AL, Márquez DC, Rodríguez AI. Approaches and perspectives to toxicogenetics and toxicogenomics. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 2014;62:605–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Koh EJ, Hwang SY. Multi-omics approaches for understanding environmental exposure and human health. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2019;15(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-019-0001-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kang M-J, Lee M-Y. Toxicoproteomic analysis of deltamethrin exposure in neuroblastoma cell lines. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2020;16(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-019-00064-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Davis AP, Grondin CJ, Johnson RJ, Sciaky D, King BL, McMorran R, et al. The comparative Toxicogenomics database: update 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D972–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw838.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Swenberg JA, Kerns WD, Mitchell RI, Gralla EJ, Pavkov KL. Induction of squamous cell carcinomas of the rat nasal cavity by inhalation exposure to formaldehyde vapor. Cancer Res. 1980;40(9):3398–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Battelle Columbus Laboratories. Final report on a chronic inhalation toxicology study in rats and mice exposed to formaldehyde. Research Triangle Park: Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kerns WD, Pavkov KL, Donofrio DJ, Gralla EJ, Swenberg JA. Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in rats and mice after long-term inhalation exposure. Cancer Res. 1983;43(9):4382–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Monticello TM, Swenberg JA, Gross EA, Leininger JR, Kimbell JS, Seilkop S, et al. Correlation of regional and nonlinear formaldehyde-induced nasal cancer with proliferating populations of cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56(5):1012–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Swenberg JA, Moeller BC, Lu K, Rager JE, Fry RC, Starr TB. Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41(2):181–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623312466459.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hauptmann M, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Blair A. Mortality from solid cancers among workers in formaldehyde industries. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(12):1117–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Golden R, Pyatt D, Shields PG. Formaldehyde as a potential human leukemogen. An assessment of biological plausibility. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36(2):135–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440500533208.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    He JL, Jin LF, Jin HY. Detection of cytogenetic effects in peripheral lymphocytes of students exposed to formaldehyde with cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay. Biomed Environ Sci. 1998;11(1):87–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ye X, Yan W, Xie H, Zhao M, Ying C. Cytogenetic analysis of nasal mucosa cells and lymphocytes from high-level long-term formaldehyde exposed workers and low-level short-term exposed waiters. Mutat Res. 2005;588(1):22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.08.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Costa S, Coelho P, Costa C, Silva S, Mayan O, Santos LS, et al. Genotoxic damage in pathology anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicology. 2008;252(1-3):40–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.056.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Costa S, Garcia-Leston J, Coelho M, Coelho P, Costa C, Silva S, et al. Cytogenetic and immunological effects associated with occupational formaldehyde exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013;76(4-5):217–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2013.757212.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Costa S, Carvalho S, Costa C, Coelho P, Silva S, Santos LS, et al. Increased levels of chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage in a group of workers exposed to formaldehyde. Mutagenesis. 2015;30(4):463–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gev002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Costa S, Costa C, Madureira J, Valdiglesias V, Teixeira-Gomes A. Guedes de Pinho P, et al. occupational exposure to formaldehyde and early biomarkers of cancer risk, immunotoxicity and susceptibility. Environ Res. 2019;179(Pt A):108740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108740.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lu K, Collins LB, Ru H, Bermudez E, Swenberg JA. Distribution of DNA adducts caused by inhaled formaldehyde is consistent with induction of nasal carcinoma but not leukemia. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116(2):441–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq061.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shaham J, Bomstein Y, Meltzer A, Kaufman Z, Palma E, Ribak J. DNA--protein crosslinks, a biomarker of exposure to formaldehyde--in vitro and in vivo studies. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17(1):121–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/17.1.121.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Neuss S, Holzmann K, Speit G. Gene expression changes in primary human nasal epithelial cells exposed to formaldehyde in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 2010;198(2):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.07.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shaham J, Bomstein Y, Gurvich R, Rashkovsky M, Kaufman Z. DNA-protein crosslinks and p53 protein expression in relation to occupational exposure to formaldehyde. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(6):403–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.6.403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Coggon D, Harris EC, Poole J, Palmer KT. Extended follow-up of a cohort of british chemical workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(21):1608–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg046.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hauptmann M, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Blair A. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(21):1615–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg083.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pinkerton LE, Hein MJ, Stayner LT. Mortality among a cohort of garment workers exposed to formaldehyde: an update. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(3):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2003.007476.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Coggon D, Ntani G, Harris EC, Palmer KT. Upper airway cancer, myeloid leukemia, and other cancers in a cohort of British chemical workers exposed to formaldehyde. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(11):1301–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Beane Freeman LE, Blair A, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Hoover RN, et al. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries: the National Cancer Institute cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):751–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp096.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Meyers AR, Pinkerton LE, Hein MJ. Cohort mortality study of garment industry workers exposed to formaldehyde: update and internal comparisons. Am J Ind Med. 2013;56(9):1027–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22199.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ott MG, Teta MJ, Greenberg HL. Lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue cancer in a chemical manufacturing environment. Am J Ind Med. 1989;16(6):631–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700160603.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Linos A, Blair A, Cantor KP, Burmeister L, VanLier S, Gibson RW, et al. Leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among embalmers and funeral directors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.1.66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Partanen T, Kauppinen T, Luukkonen R, Hakulinen T, Pukkala E. Malignant lymphomas and leukemias, and exposures in the wood industry: an industry-based case-referent study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;64(8):593–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00517706.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Blair A, Zheng T, Linos A, Stewart PA, Zhang YW, Cantor KP. Occupation and leukemia: a population-based case-control study in Iowa and Minnesota. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.1066.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hauptmann M, Stewart PA, Lubin JH, Beane Freeman LE, Hornung RW, Herrick RF, et al. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies and brain cancer among embalmers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(24):1696–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp416.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gentry PR, Rodricks JV, Turnbull D, Bachand A, Van Landingham C, Shipp AM, et al. Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: critical review and reevaluation of the results from a study that is the focus for evidence of biological plausibility. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013;43(8):661–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.818618.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Checkoway H, Dell LD, Boffetta P, Gallagher AE, Crawford L, Lees PS, et al. Formaldehyde exposure and mortality risks from acute myeloid leukemia and other Lymphohematopoietic malignancies in the US National Cancer Institute cohort study of Workers in Formaldehyde Industries. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(7):785–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000466.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kwon SC, Kim I, Song J, Park J. Does formaldehyde have a causal association with nasopharyngeal cancer and leukaemia? Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018;30(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0218-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Heck H, Casanova M. The implausibility of leukemia induction by formaldehyde: a critical review of the biological evidence on distant-site toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004;40(2):92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.05.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Casanova M, Heck HD, Everitt JI, Harrington WW Jr, Popp JA. Formaldehyde concentrations in the blood of rhesus monkeys after inhalation exposure. Food Chem Toxicol. 1988;26(8):715–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(88)90071-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Casanova-Schmitz M, Starr TB, Heck HD. Differentiation between metabolic incorporation and covalent binding in the labeling of macromolecules in the rat nasal mucosa and bone marrow by inhaled [14C]- and [3H]formaldehyde. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984;76(1):26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(84)90026-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Casanova M, Heck HA. Further studies of the metabolic incorporation and covalent binding of inhaled [3H]- and [14C] formaldehyde in Fischer-344 rats: effects of glutathione depletion. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1987;89(1):105–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(87)90181-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Moeller BC, Lu K, Doyle-Eisele M, McDonald J, Gigliotti A, Swenberg JA. Determination of N2-hydroxymethyl-dG adducts in the nasal epithelium and bone marrow of nonhuman primates following 13CD2-formaldehyde inhalation exposure. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24(2):162–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx1004166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Yu R, Lai Y, Hartwell HJ, Moeller BC, Doyle-Eisele M, Kracko D, et al. Formation, accumulation, and hydrolysis of endogenous and exogenous formaldehyde-induced DNA damage. Toxicol Sci. 2015;146(1):170–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv079.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lai Y, Yu R, Hartwell HJ, Moeller BC, Bodnar WM, Swenberg JA. Measurement of endogenous versus exogenous formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein crosslinks in animal tissues by stable isotope labeling and ultrasensitive mass spectrometry. Cancer Res. 2016;76(9):2652–61. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2527.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Soffritti M, Maltoni C, Maffei F, Biagi R. Formaldehyde: an experimental multipotential carcinogen. Toxicol Ind Health. 1989;5(5):699–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823378900500510.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kitaeva LV, Kitaev EM, Pimenova MN. The cytopathic and cytogenetic sequelae of chronic inhalational exposure to formaldehyde on female germ cells and bone marrow cells in rats. Tsitologiia. 1990;32(12):1212–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ye X, Ji Z, Wei C, McHale CM, Ding S, Thomas R, et al. Inhaled formaldehyde induces DNA-protein crosslinks and oxidative stress in bone marrow and other distant organs of exposed mice. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013;54(9):705–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21821.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhang Y, Liu X, McHale C, Li R, Zhang L, Wu Y, et al. Bone marrow injury induced via oxidative stress in mice by inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74974. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074974.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhang Y, McHale CM, Liu X, Yang X, Ding S, Zhang L. Data on megakaryocytes in the bone marrow of mice exposed to formaldehyde. Data Brief. 2016;6:948–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.12.058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wei C, Wen H, Yuan L, McHale CM, Li H, Wang K, et al. Formaldehyde induces toxicity in mouse bone marrow and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and enhances benzene-induced adverse effects. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(2):921–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1760-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ge J, Yang H, Lu X, Wang S, Zhao Y, Huang J, et al. Combined exposure to formaldehyde and PM2.5: Hematopoietic toxicity and molecular mechanism in mice. Environ Int. 2020;144:106050.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yu G, Chen Q, Liu X, Guo C, Du H, Sun Z. Formaldehyde induces bone marrow toxicity in mice by inhibiting peroxiredoxin 2 expression. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(4):1915–20. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2473.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yu GY, Song XF, Liu Y, Sun ZW. Inhaled formaldehyde induces bone marrow toxicity via oxidative stress in exposed mice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(13):5253–7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.13.5253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Garaycoechea JI, Crossan GP, Langevin F, Daly M, Arends MJ, Patel KJ. Genotoxic consequences of endogenous aldehydes on mouse haematopoietic stem cell function. Nature. 2012;489(7417):571–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11368.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Pontel LB, Rosado IV, Burgos-Barragan G, Garaycoechea JI, Yu R, Arends MJ, et al. Endogenous formaldehyde is a hematopoietic stem cell Genotoxin and metabolic carcinogen. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Klaunig JE, Xu Y, Isenberg JS, Bachowski S, Kolaja KL, Jiang J, et al. The role of oxidative stress in chemical carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(Suppl 1):289–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Christiansen DH, Desta F, Andersen MK. Alternative genetic pathways and cooperating genetic abnormalities in the pathogenesis of therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2006;20(11):1943–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404381.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Montagutelli X. Effect of the genetic background on the phenotype of mouse mutations. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(Suppl 16):S101–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Yasuda SP, Yuki M, Yoshiaki K. Effects of genetic background on susceptibility and the acceleration of hearing loss in mice. In An Excursus into Hearing Loss. IntechOpen. 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Shin JY, Jung HJ, Moon A. Molecular markers in sex differences in Cancer. Toxicol Res. 2019;35(4):331–41. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.4.331.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Park J, Kwon SO, Kim S-H, Kim SJ, Koh EJ, Won S, et al. Methylation quantitative trait loci analysis in Korean exposome study. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2020;16(2):175–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-019-00068-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zou D, Ma L, Yu J, Zhang Z. Biological databases for human research. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Li Y, Chen L. Big biological data: challenges and opportunities. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2014;12(5):187–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2014.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Choi YH, Han CY, Kim KS, Kim SG. Future directions of Pharmacovigilance studies using electronic medical recording and human genetic databases. Toxicol Res. 2019;35(4):319–30. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.4.319.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nikitin A, Egorov S, Daraselia N, Mazo I. Pathway studio—the analysis and navigation of molecular networks. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(16):2155–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg290.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Gao X, Petricoin EF 3rd, Ward KR, Goldberg SR, Duane TM, Bonchev D, et al. Network proteomics of human dermal wound healing. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(12):124002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aaee19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Xu C, Cao H, Zhang F, Cheadle C. Comprehensive literature data-mining analysis reveals a broad genetic network functionally associated with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Mol Med. 2018;42(5):2353–62. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2018.3845.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Dutta T, Nayak C, Bhattacharjee S. Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase and glutathione S-Transferase enzyme activities and their correlation with genotypic variations based on GST M1 and GST T1 loci in long term-pesticide-exposed tea garden workers of sub-Himalayan West Bengal. Toxicol Environ Health Sci. 2019;11(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-019-0389-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Rager JE, Moeller BC, Miller SK, Kracko D, Doyle-Eisele M, Swenberg JA, et al. Formaldehyde-associated changes in microRNAs: tissue and temporal specificity in the rat nose, white blood cells, and bone marrow. Toxicol Sci. 2014;138(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft267.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Batty N, Ghonimi E, Feng L, Fayad L, Younes A, Rodriguez MA, et al. The absolute monocyte and lymphocyte prognostic index for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who receive R-CHOP. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013;13(1):15–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2012.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Scarfo L, Ferreri AJ, Ghia P. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;104:169–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Zhao Y, Wei C, Wu Y, Ma P, Ding S, Yuan J, et al. Formaldehyde-induced paxillin-tyrosine phosphorylation and paxillin and P53 downexpression in Hela cells. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2016;26(2):75–81. https://doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2015.1082001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Tang XQ, Ren YK, Zhou CF, Yang CT, Gu HF, He JQ, et al. Hydrogen sulfide prevents formaldehyde-induced neurotoxicity to PC12 cells by attenuation of mitochondrial dysfunction and pro-apoptotic potential. Neurochem Int. 2012;61(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2012.04.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Tsukahara S, Yamamoto S, Win-Shwe T-T, Ahmed S, Kunugita N, Arashidani K, et al. Inhalation of low-level formaldehyde increases the Bcl-2/Bax expression ratio in the hippocampus of immunologically sensitized mice. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2006;13(2):63–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094829.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414(6859):105–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102167.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Del Principe MI, Dal Bo M, Bittolo T, Buccisano F, Rossi FM, Zucchetto A, et al. Clinical significance of bax/bcl-2 ratio in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2016;101(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2015.131854.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Yang L, Rau R, Goodell MA. DNMT3A in haematological malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(3):152–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3895.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Liu Q, Yang L, Gong C, Tao G, Huang H, Liu J, et al. Effects of long-term low-dose formaldehyde exposure on global genomic hypomethylation in 16HBE cells. Toxicol Lett. 2011;205(3):235–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.1039.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Tong Z, Han C, Qiang M, Wang W, Lv J, Zhang S, et al. Age-related formaldehyde interferes with DNA methyltransferase function, causing memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(1):100–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Baseggio L, Bienvenu J, Charlot C, Picollet J, Felman P, Coiffier B, et al. Higher LPS-stimulated TNF-alpha mRNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Exp Hematol. 2001;29(3):330–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-472X(00)00672-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Stifter G, Heiss S, Gastl G, Tzankov A, Stauder R. Over-expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in bone marrow biopsies from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: relationship to anemia and prognosis. Eur J Haematol. 2005;75(6):485–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00551.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Hoermann G, Greiner G, Valent P. Cytokine regulation of microenvironmental cells in Myeloproliferative neoplasms. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Lee MH, Lee BH, Shin HS, Lee MO. Elevated levels of PDGF receptor and MDM2 as potential biomarkers for formaldehyde intoxication. Toxicol Res. 2008;24(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2008.24.1.045.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Zeller J, Neuss S, Mueller JU, Kuhner S, Holzmann K, Hogel J, et al. Assessment of genotoxic effects and changes in gene expression in humans exposed to formaldehyde by inhalation under controlled conditions. Mutagenesis. 2011;26(4):555–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/ger016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through The Chemical Accident Prevention Technology Development Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2017001970001) and (2018001350006).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DSK and HSK collected and analyzed data. DSK wrote the manuscript. JHJ, CML, and YSA reviewed and revised the manuscript. YRS supervised the entire processes. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Rok Seo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have read the manuscript and approved its submission and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, D.S., Kim, H.S., Jung, JH. et al. Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia risk: a comprehensive review and network-based toxicogenomic approach. Genes and Environ 43, 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-021-00183-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Formaldehyde
  • Leukemia
  • Toxicogenomics
  • Biological network analysis
  • Carcinogenicity